[an error occurred while processing this directive]
临床研究

延长间断肾脏替代治疗非计划性下机相关因素分析

  • 李雪洁 ,
  • 郑茜子 ,
  • 于重燕 ,
  • 金其庄
展开
  • 1. 北京大学第一医院肾内科,北京大学肾脏病研究所卫生部肾脏疾病重点实验室

收稿日期: 2019-06-24

  修回日期: 2019-11-11

  网络出版日期: 2019-12-30

基金资助

北京大学第一医院科研种子基金(2019SF72)

Related factors of unscheduled interruption during prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy

  • LI Xue-Jie ,
  • ZHENG Qian-Zi ,
  • YU Zhong-Yan ,
  • JIN Qi-Zhuang
Expand
  •  1Department of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, China Ministry of Health; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment, China Ministry of Education,
    Beijing 100034, China

Received date: 2019-06-24

  Revised date: 2019-11-11

  Online published: 2019-12-30

摘要

【摘要】目的探讨笔者中心实施延长间断肾脏替代治疗(prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy,PIRRT)非计划性下机的相关因素,对后续质量改进提供依据。方法以2017 年1 月1 日~12 月31 日由北京大学第一医院肾内科行PIRRT 治疗的住院患者及其治疗例次作为研究对象,回顾性采集数据进行分析。结果82 例患者接受的898 例次治疗最终纳入本研究,非计划性下机共259 例
次(28.8%)。管路及滤器凝血共212 例次,占非计划下机比例81.9%。与计划性下机组相比,非计划性下机组无肝素抗凝比例更高(34.7% 比13.3% ,χ2=71.941,P<0.001),股静脉导管使用率(68.3% 比59.8%,χ2=5.745,P=0.010)及最高滤过分数[(31.7 ± 5.3)% 比(31.0±4.6)%,t=-1.985,P=0.047]均更高。2 组间护士学历(62.9%比64.9% ,χ2=0.304,P=0.318)、护士工作年限[(3.3±2.0)比(3.6±2.1),t=-1.833,P=0.064]及患护比无显著差异[(1.8±0.7)比(1.9±0.8),t=-0.971,P=0.360]。结论抗凝方式选择不当、滤过分数设置过高及导管功能不良等导致循环管路及滤器凝血是笔者中心非计划性下机的主要原因。在经过规范化培训和考核后,护士学历及工作年限对非计划性下机发生无显著影响。

本文引用格式

李雪洁 , 郑茜子 , 于重燕 , 金其庄 . 延长间断肾脏替代治疗非计划性下机相关因素分析[J]. 中国血液净化, 2020 , 19(01) : 3 -6 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2020.01.002

Abstract

【Abstract】Objective To explore the related factors of unscheduled interruption during prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT). Method The medical records of all patients received PIRRT in the Renal Department of Peking University First Hospital from January 2017 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Circuit and patient data were collected and analyzed. Result A total of 82 patients with 898 circuits were finally included in this study, in which 259 circuits (28.8%) were considered as unscheduled interruption. Circuit clotting was observed in 212 cases of the unscheduled interruption (81.9%). Compared to the scheduled group, the unscheduled group was more likely not to receive anticoagulation (34.7% vs. 13.3%,
χ2=71.941, P<0.001), to use femoral vein catheters (68.3% vs. 59.8%, χ2=5.745, P=0.010), and to have higher level of the highest filtration fraction (31.7±5.3% vs. 31.0±4.6%, t=-1.985, P=0.047). There were no significant differences in the education degree of nurses (62.9% vs. 64.9%, χ2=0.304, P=0.318), working years of nurses (3.3 ± 2.0 vs. 3.6 ± 2.1, t=- 0.971, P=0.064), and patient- nurse ratio (1.8 ± 0.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8, t=- 1.833, P=0.360) between the two groups. Conclusion The main reason for unscheduled interruption during PIRRT in our dialysis center was circuit clotting caused by inappropriate use of anticoagulation, higher filtration fraction and catheter malfunction. After regular and standardized training, the education degree and working years of nurses had no significant impact on unscheduled interruption.

参考文献

[1]Tandukar S, Palevsky PM.Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Who,When,Why,and How[J].Chest, 2019, 155(3):626-638 [2]Tolwani A.Continuous renal-replacement therapy for acute kidney injury[J].N Engl J Med, 2013, 368(12):1160-1161 [3]Roeder V R, Atkins H N, Ryan M A, et al.Putting the 'C' back into continuous renal replacement therapy[J].Nephrology Nursing Journal Journal of the American Nephrology Nurses Association, 2013, 40(6):509-15 [4]Rewa O, Villeneuve PM, Eurich DT, et al.Quality indicators in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) care in critically ill patients: protocol for a systematic review[J].Systematic Reviews, 2015, 4(1):102-102 [5]赵君花, 卢燕, 丁琳.例次治疗故障报警原因分析及指导[J].中国血液净化, 2014, 13(4):353-354 [6]费素定, 金静芬, 王海燕.连续性肾脏替代治疗非计划性下机时间相关因素的研究[J].中华护理杂志, 2015, 50(1):57-61 [7]Joannidis M, Oudeman-svan Straaten HM.Clinical review: Patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy[J].Crit Care, 2007, 11(4):218-218 [8]Tan HK, Baldwin I, Bellomo R.Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration without anticoagulation in high-risk patients[J].Intensive Care Med, 2000, 26(11):1652-1657 [9]Straaten O V, Heleen.Hemostasis and Thrombosis in Continuous Renal Replacement Treatment[J].Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 2015, 41(01):091-098 [10]Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes KDIGO.KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury[J].Kidney International, 2012, 2(1):1-138 [11]Bai M, Zhou M, He L, et al.Citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy: an updated meta-analysis of RCTs[J].Intensive Care Medicine, 2015, 41(12):2098-2110 [12]Straaten O V, Wester J P J, Pont A C J M D, et al.Anticoagulation strategies in continuous renal replacement therapy: can the choice be evidence based?[J].Intensive Care Medicine, 2006, 32(2):188-202 [13]李克佳, 付月亿, 王欢.连续性肾脏替代治疗体外循环凝血的影响因素及预防对策研究进展[J].中国血液净化, 2018, 17(2):129-132 [14]Macewen C, Watkinson P, Winearls C.Circuit Life Versus Bleeding Risk: The Impact of Achieved Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Versus Achieved Filtration Fraction[J].Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 2015, 19(3):259-266 [15]Chawla L S, Bellomo R, Bihorac A, et al.Acute kidney disease and renal recovery: consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 16 Workgroup[J].Nature Reviews Nephrology, 2017, 13(4):241-257 [16]Parienti J J, Thirion M, Bruno Mégarbane, et al.Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization and Risk of Nosocomial Events in Adults Requiring Acute Renal Replacement Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J].Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2008, 48(5):2413-2413 [17]王好, 崔俊.患者血管通路血流量不足的原因分析及护理对策[J].中国血液净化, 2013, 12(3):170-173 [18]张凌.连续性肾脏替代治疗体外循环寿命的影响因素[J].临床肾脏病杂志, 2015, 15(10):580-584 [19]Baldwin I, Fealy N.Nursing for Renal Replacement Therapies in the Intensive Care Unit: Historical,Educational,and Protocol Review[J].Blood Purification, 2009, 27(2):174-181 [20]李文奇, 刘俊雅, 刘伟权.连续性肾脏替代治疗非计划性下机危险因素研究进展[J].护理研究, 2017, 31(24):2976-2978 [21]邝炎辉, 李芸.连续性肾脏替代治疗患者非计划性下机时间的相关因素分析[J].护士进修杂志, 2017, 32(16):1486-1488
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]