【摘要】目的探讨动机性访谈对维持性血液透析患者自我管理能力及生活质量的影响。方法选取浙江省人民医院血液净化中心维持性血液透析患者100 例,按照透析时间分为干预组50 例和对照组50 例。对照组采用传统的健康教育方法,干预组实施动机性访谈,干预前、干预6 个月后用自我管理量表和肾脏疾病特异性调查表对患者自我管理能力和生活质量进行评价。结果自我管理能力评分中伙伴关系、问题解决、情绪处理、实施自我护理及总分干预组均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t 值分别为20.131、13.645、12.213,15.012、17.043,P 值分别为0.021、0.012、0.023、0.001、0.004),生活质量评分中躯体症状、疲劳、与他人的关系得分和总分干预组均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t 值分别为10.586、3.560、3.959、4.574,P 值分别为0.001、0.001、0.001、0.001)。结论动机性访谈可以提高维持性血液透析患者的自我管理能力和生活质量,值得在临床推广。
【Abstract】Objective To investigate the impact of motivational interview on self-management ability and quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Methods A total of 100 MHD patients were recruited in a top-level hospital in Hangzhou city. According to the duration of hemodialysis, the patients were divided into the intervention group (n=50) and the control group (n=50). The control group adopted the traditional health education method, and the intervention group received the motivational interview. Self-management scale and kidney disease specific questionnaire were used to evaluate their self-management ability and quality of life before intervention and after the intervention for 6 months. Results In the scores of selfmanagement ability, partnership, problem solving, emotional processing, self-care and total score were statistically higher in the intervention group than in the control group (t=20.131, 13.645, 12.213, 15.012 and 17.043 respectively; P=0.021,0.012, 0.023, 0.001 and 0.004 respectively). In the scores of quality of life, somatic symptoms, fatigue, relationship with others and total score were statistically higher in the intervention group than in the control group (t=10.586, 3.560, 3.959 and 4.574 respectively; P=0.001, 0.001, 0.001 and 0.001 respectively). Conclusion Motivational interview can improve the self- management ability and quality of life in MHD patients.
[1]李雪,孙晓晶.自我管理行为对维持性血液透析患者自我感受负担的影响研究.中华护理杂志,2016,51(5):562-566.
[2]尹丽霞,胡晓艳,张海林,等.透析中运动对维持性血液透析患者透析充分性及睡眠质量的影响.中国护理管理,2017,17(11):1478-1481.
[3]郝艳华,姜亚芳.维持性血液透析患者症状经历的调查研究.中华护理杂志,2016,51(3):
299-303.
[4] 方乐,张新卫.动机性访谈的理论与实践.现代实用医学,2011,23(9):1078-1080.
[5]李萌,李婷,施秉银,等.动机性访谈对长期血糖控制不良2型糖尿病患者生存质量及相关因素的影响.中华护理杂志,2014,49(1):6-10.
[6]李慧,曹营东,姜亚方,等.血液透析患者自我管理量表的引进及信效度检测.中华护理杂志,2015,50(11):1492-1495.
[7]王颖,林可可.维持性血液透析患者生活质量及其相关因素分析.中国血液净化,2010,9 (2):106-108.
[8]许秀君,周美玲,沈华娟,等.“三定”管理模式对诱导透析患者并发症的影响.护士进修杂志,2017,32(4):344-345.
[9] Spaeth M,Bleich S,Hillemacher T.Motivational interviewing?with alcohol- dependent patients.Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr,2017,85(9):549 -565.
[10] 张颖君,薛责方,扬玉洁,等.授权教育对维持性血液透析患者健康素养及自我管理能力的影响.中国血液净化,2018,17(3):193-196.
[11]周华.血液透析患者健康教育现状与进展.上海护理,2011,11(6):74-77.
[12]庄利梅,谢菲,戴莉敏,等.思维导图结合动机性访谈对青年糖尿病患者自我管理的影响.中国护理管理,2014,14(12):1330-1333.