自拟慢泡快冲改良预充法在无肝素血液透析中的临床观察

陆晓凤; 金炜; 杨丽红; 张艳霞; 钱玲玲; 赵湘

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2020.02.004

中国血液净化 >

2020 , Vol. 19 >Issue 02: 85 - 87

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2020.02.004

临床研究

自拟慢泡快冲改良预充法在无肝素血液透析中的临床观察

陆晓凤 ,
金炜 ,
杨丽红 ,
张艳霞 ,
钱玲玲 ,
赵湘

展开

1. 浙江省桐乡市第一人民医院肾内科
2. 浙江省人民医院肾脏病科

收稿日期: 2019-06-13

修回日期: 2019-12-05

网络出版日期: 2020-02-12

基金资助

浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LY16H05004)；浙江省科技厅公益项目(2015C33204)；桐乡市引导性科技计划项目(201702095)

收起

Clinical observation on the modified pre-flushing method of soaking slowly and rushing fast in heparinfree hemodialysis

LU Xiao-Feng ,
JIN Wei ,
YANG Li-Hong ,
ZHANG Yan-Xia ,
QIAN Ling-Ling ,
ZHAO Xiang

Expand

1Department of Nephrology, Tongxiang First People’s Hospital, Tongxiang 314500, China; 2Department of Nephrology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China

Received date: 2019-06-13

Revised date: 2019-12-05

Online published: 2020-02-12

Fold

摘要

【摘要】目的探讨自拟慢泡快冲改良预充法在无肝素抗凝血液透析(hemodialysis，HD)中的临床应用价值。方法选择2018 年1 月～2019 年3 月间桐乡市第一人民医院血液净化中心行无肝素抗凝的血液透析患者38 例，随机分为2 组。A 组：采用传统方法进行透析器及管路预充；B 组：采用慢泡快冲改良法进行预冲。每组19 例，每例患者观察周期4 例次。记录透析过程中透析器及管路凝血评级、生理盐水冲洗次数、透析时间等，并于第4 例次HD 时测定eKt/V。结果相比采用传统方法，B 组患者在透析器、透析管路凝血0 级、II 级、III 级的比较差异均有统计学意义(t 值分别为7.851，3.437，8.774；P 值分别为0.013，0.009，＜0.001)；生理盐水冲洗次数比较中，0 次、1 次、3 次、≥4 次经比较差异具有统计学意义(t 值分别为7.602，8.959，5.848，8.192；P 值分别为0.031，0.006，0.024，0.018)；2 组HD 时间≥3h 的百分率分别为87.2%、97.4%，经比较差异具有统计学意义(t=6.752，P=0.011)；2 组eKt/V 达标率比较差异具有统计学意义(t =8.039，P =0.023)。结论自拟慢泡快冲改良预充法在无肝素抗凝HD 治疗中，应用简单、经济、安全，且不影响透析充分性。

关键词： 无肝素; 改良预充; 血液透析

本文引用格式

陆晓凤 , 金炜 , 杨丽红 , 张艳霞 , 钱玲玲 , 赵湘 . 自拟慢泡快冲改良预充法在无肝素血液透析中的临床观察[J]. 中国血液净化, 2020 , 19(02) : 85 -87 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2020.02.004

Abstract

【Abstract】Objective To discuss clinical application value of the modified pre-flushing method by soaking slowly and rushing fast in heparin-free hemodialysis. Methods A total of 38 patients of heparin-free dialysis in the Blood Purification Center of Tongxiang First People’s Hospital from Jan. 2018 to Mar. 2019 were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups. The traditional pre-flushing method of dialyzer and pipeline was used in the group A (n=19), and the modified method of soaking slowly and rushing fast was used in the group B (n=19). The observation period was 4 dialysis sessions for every patient. Blood clotting grade in dialyzer and pipeline, the number of flushing by normal saline, and actual dialysis time were

recorded. eKt/V was estimated at the fourth hemodialysis session for every patient. Results Blood clotting in dialyzer and pipeline at 0、II and III grades were better in group B than in group A (t=7.851, 3.437 and 8.774 respectively; P=0.013, 0.009 and ＜0.001 respectively). Normal saline flushing for 0, 1, 3 and ≥4 times were statistically different between group A and B (t=7.602, 8.959, 5.848 and 8.192 respectively; P=0.031, 0.006, 0.024 and 0.018 respectively). The percentage of hemodialysis time greater than or equal to 3h was 87.2% and 97.4% in group A and B respectively (t=6.752, P=0.011). The rate of eKt/V compliant with the standard was 82.1% in group A and 94.8% in group B (t=8.039, P=0.023). Conclusion The modified preflushing method of soaking slowly and rushing fast in heparin-free hemodialysis was simple, inexpensive and safe and did not affect the adequacy of hemodialysis. This method is worthy to be used clinically.

Key words： Heparin-free; Modified pre-flushing; Hemodialysis

参考文献

[1]陈香美. 血液净化标准操作规程[M]．第1版．北京：人民军医出版社。2010：47.

[2]徐帮琴，王胜利，马素珍. 无肝素透析的临床应用价值[J]．淮海医药，2009：27（1）：72-73．

[3]刘婉莹，徐虹，杜烨辉. 改进无肝素血液透析的临床体会[J].中国血液净化，2008，7（1）：51.

[4]朱秋霞. 不输盐水、无肝素的血液透析[J].南京部队医药，1998，5：27-28.

[5]Kodras K，Benesch T，Neumann l，et a1. Comparison of two dialysers(AN69ST vs．FX 100)for heparin-free dialysis in patients with oral anticoagulation[J]．Blood Purification，2008，26(3)：226-230．

[6]Wright S，Steinwandel U，Fenaft P. Citrate anticoagulation using ACD solution A during long-term haemodialysis[J]．Nephrology，2011，16(4)：396-402．

[7]Rossignol P，Dorval M，Fay R，et al. Rationale and design of the HepZero study：a prospective，multicenter，international，open，randomized，controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane(Evodial)versus standard care：study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]．Trials，2013，14：163．

[8]陈香美. 血液净化标准操作规程[M]．第1版．北京：人民军医出版社。2010：68.

[9]谢华，林洪丽，陈淑妮，等. 局部体外肝素、无肝素及低分子肝素抗凝在有出血倾向的血液透析中的对比研究[J].大连医科大学学报，2011，33（1）：46-50.

[10]张竞葳，梁少媚，钟志慧，等. 白蛋白涂布法应用于无肝素血液透析[J].现代医药卫生，2006，22（20）：3175-3176.

[11]朱淑华，樊蓉，徐斌，等. 简化枸橼酸抗凝无肝素透析的疗效观察[J].肾脏与透析肾移植，2017，26（4）：323-327.

[12]黄光敏. 肝素盐水浸泡透析器对无肝素透析患者透析器凝血的影响[J].中国实用护理杂志，2009，25（3）：23-24.

[13]Solbjorg Sagedal，Anders Hartmann，Kare Osnes，et a1. Intermittent saline flushes during haemodialysis do not alleviate coagulation and clot formation in stable patients receiving reduced doses of dalheparin[J]．Nephrol Dial Transplant，2006，21：444-449．

[14]吴春燕，王文娟，刘翔，等. 无肝素预冲对血液透析患者透析充分性的影响[J].中国实用护理杂志，2011,27（16）：6-8.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献