【摘要】目的评估血液透析患者透析过敏反应的发生率和临床特征。方法回顾性分析辽宁省4所医院2016 年12 月～2019 年12 月需要更换透析器的过敏反应的临床资料，包括临床症状、发作时间、责任透析器、接触责任透析器时间、替代透析器等。结果853 名患者中透析器过敏反应共18 例，发生率为2.11%，最常见症状为呼吸困难(50%)、皮肤瘙痒(33.33%)。12 例过敏症状在透析后的前30min 内出现，9 例反应发生在血液透析的第1 周。所涉及的膜为聚砜/聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(polysulfone/polyvinylpyrrolidone，PS/PVP)膜(9 例)、聚芳醚砜/聚乙烯吡咯烷酮/聚酰胺(polyethersulfone/polyvinylpyrrolidone/polyamide,PAES/PVP/PA)膜(7 例)、聚芳醚砜/聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(polyethersulfone/polyvinylpyrrolidone,PAES/PVP)膜(2 例)。血液透析13 例(72.22%)，血液透析滤过5 例(27.78%)，灭菌方式均为蒸汽灭菌。3 例更换为不同类型的PS 或PAES 膜后仍有交叉过敏反应，18 例替换为三醋酸纤维素膜后均未再次发生过敏反应。结论合成膜透析器过敏反应发生率与20 年前相比波动不大，三醋酸纤维素膜可能是聚砜膜及其衍生膜过敏较好的替代膜，具体原因还需未来研究进一步探索。
【Abstract】Aims To assess the incidence and characteristics of hypersensitive reactions to dialyzer in hemodialysis patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the patients necessary to change dialyzers due to hypersensitivity to the dialyzers in the four hospitals in Liaoning province during December 2016 to December 2019. Their clinical data including symptoms, onset time, offending dialyzer, duration of exposure to the dialyzer, and the alternative dialyzer were collected. Results Eighteen patients out of 853 patients (2.11%) had hypersensitive reactions. The most frequent symptoms were dyspnea (50% of reactions) and skin itch (33.33%). Hypersensitive reactions occurred within the first 30 minutes of hemodialysis in 12 cases, and during the first week of dialysis in 9 cases. The membranes involved were polysulfone (n=9), polyamix (n=8) and polyethersulfone (n=2). Thirteen cases were treated with hemodialysis, and 5 cases with hemodiafiltration. The dialyzers were sterilized by steam. Three cases still had hypersensitive reactions when the dialysis membranes were replaced by different types of PS/PAES membranes. All of the cases became asymptomatic when cellulose triacetate membranes were used. Conclusion The incidence of hypersensitive reactions
associated with synthetic membranes is less changed compared with that 20 years ago. Cellulose triacetate membrane appears to be a better alternative, of which the reason needs to be further studied.
[1]Boer WH, Liem Y, De BE, et al.Acute reactions to polysulfonepolyethersulfone dialysers: literature review and management[J].Netherlands Journal of Medicine, 2017, 75(1):4-13
[2]POOTHULLIL, J.Anaphylaxis from the Product(s) of Ethylene Oxide Gas[J].Annals of Internal Medicine, 1975, 82(1):58-60
[3] Esteras Raquel, Martín-Navarro Juan, Ledesma Gabriel, et al.Incidence of Hypersensitivity Reactions During Hemodialysis2018, 43: 1472-1478.[J].Kidney Blood Press. Res, 2018, 43(5):1472-1478
[4]P Simon, J Potier, H E Thebaud.Risk factors for acute hypersensitivity reactions in hemodialysis[J].Nephrologie, 1996, 17(3):163-170
[5] Daugirdas J T, Ing T S, Roxe D M, et al.Severe Anaphylactoid Reactions to Cuprammonium Cellulose Hemodialyzers [J].Archives of Internal Medicine, 1985, 145(3):489-494
[6]Daugirdas J T, Ing T S.First-use reactions during hemodialysis: A definition of subtypes[J].Kidney international. Supplement, 1988, 24(24):S37-43
[7] Mukaya J E, Jacobson M S, Esprit D, et al.Allergic reaction to polysulphone membrane dialyser masquerading as infection [J].BMJ Case Reports, 2015, 2015((Feb 18 1)):-
[8]Posadas M A, Hahn D, Schleuter W, et al.Thrombocytopenia associated with dialysis treatments[J].Hemodialysis International, 2011, 15(3):416-423
[9]Marques I D B, Karina Fran?a Pinheiro, Lílian Pires de Freitas do Carmo, et al.Anaphylactic reaction induced by a polysulfonepolyvinylpyrrolidone membrane in the 10th session of hemodialysis with the same dialyzer[J].Hemodialysis International, 2011, 15(3):399-403
[10]Verresen L, Fink E, Lemke H D, et al.Bradykinin is a mediator of anaphylactoid reactions during hemodialysis with AN69 membranes[J].Kidney International, 1994, 45(5):1497-1503
[11] Aranzazu Rodríguez-Sanz, Rafael Sánchez-Villanueva, Javier Domínguez-Ortega, et al.Mechanisms Involved in Hypersensitivity Reactions to Polysulfone Hemodialysis Membranes[J].Artificial Organs, 2017, 41(11):E285-E295
[12]Ebo D G, Bosmans J L, Couttenye M M, et al.Haemodialysis-associated anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions[J].Allergy, 2006, 61(2):211-220
[13] Shu Kai-Hsiang, Kao Tze-Wah, Chiang Wen-Chih et al.A case of anaphylactic shock induced by FX60 polysulfone hemodialyzer but not F6-HPS polysulfone hemodialyzer,[J].Hemodial Int, 2014, 18(1):841-845
[14] Sánchez-Villanueva Rafael J, González Elena, Quirce Santiago, et al.Hypersensitivity reactions to synthetic haemodialysis membranes[J].Nefrologia, 2014, 34(4):520-525
[15]Kuragano T, Kuno T, Takahashi Y, et al.Comparison of the Effects of Cellulose Triacetate and Polysulfone Membrane on GPIIbIIIa and Platelet Activation[J].Blood Purification, 2003, 21(2):176-182
[16] Urbani Andrea, Sirolli Vittorio, Lupisella Santina, et al.Proteomic investigations on the effect of different membrane materials on blood protein adsorption during haemodialysis[J].Blood Transfus, 2012, 10(Suppl 2):s101-112
[17] Alvarez-de Lara M Antonia, Martín-Malo Alejandro.Hypersensitivity reactions to synthetic haemodialysis membranes an emerging issue?[J].Nefrologia, 2014, 34(6):698-702
[18] 王质刚.血液净化学[M].4版.北京:北京科学技术出版社，2016，9-14.
[19]云扬, 张晨, 刘乃全, 等.三醋酸纤维素膜与聚砜膜透析器在维持性血液透析患者的临床对照研究[J].中国血液净化, 2018, v.17(08):24-29
[20]Liu Shuangxin, Shi Wei, Liang Xinling，et al.Cellulose Triacetate Dialyzer Reduces Platelet Loss during Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration[J].Blood Purification, 2010, 29(4):375-382
[21] Olafiranye F, Kyaw W, Olafiranye O .Resolution of Dialyzer Membrane-Associated Thrombocytopenia with Use of Cellulose Triacetate Membrane: A Case Report[J].Case Reports in Medicine, 2011, 2011:1-3
