[an error occurred while processing this directive]
临床研究

高通量血液透析对比低通量血液透析临床效果Meta 分析

  • 蒋宇豪 ,
  • 王耀羚 ,
  • 郭武栋 ,
  • 赵琨 ,
  • 王世宇
展开
  • 1成都中医药大学
    2国家卫生健康委卫生发展研究中心

收稿日期: 2020-07-21

  修回日期: 2020-09-14

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-08

Clinical effect of high flux hemodialysis versus low flux hemodialysis: a meta analysis

  • JIANG Yu-Hao ,
  • WANG Yao-Ling ,
  • GUO Wu-Dong ,
  • ZHAO Kun ,
  • WANG Shi-Yu
Expand
  • 1Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China;  2China National Health Development Research Center, Beijing 100044,China

Received date: 2020-07-21

  Revised date: 2020-09-14

  Online published: 2020-12-08

摘要

[摘要]目的采用荟萃(Meta)分析评价和比较高通量血液透析(high flux hemodialysis,HFHD)与低通量血液透析(low flux hemodialysis, LFHD)对于终末期肾病(end-stage renal disease,ESRD)患者的效果。方法系统检索中国知网、万方、PubMed、Cochrane library、Embase 等数据库中有关HFHD 与LFHD 治疗ESRD 患者的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials,RCT)、准RCT 等研究文献,采用RevMan5.3 统计软件进行Meta 分析。结果最终纳入22项研究,共7590 例患者。Meta 分析结果显示HFHD 全因死亡率(RR=0.766, 95% CI 0.659~0.890,P<0.001)低于LFHD。与LFHD组比较,HFHD组患者在心血管疾病死亡率、β2-微球蛋白(beta-2 microglobulin, β2-MG)清除、总胆固醇和三酰甘油水平、炎症反应指标上均显示出了相对较好的效果(RR/MD/SMD 值分别为0.792,- 10.235,- 0.244, - 0.248,-0.225;95% CI 分别为0.696~0.901,- 12.475~- 7.994,- 0.446~- 0.041,- 0.406~- 0.090,- 0.340~-0.110;P 值分别为<0.001,<0.001,0.020,0.002,<0.001)。结论HFHD 较LFHD 其死亡率和心血管疾病死亡率低,拥有良好的β2-MG、血脂、炎症因子等清除效果,对ESRD 患者能带来较大的疗效获益。

本文引用格式

蒋宇豪 , 王耀羚 , 郭武栋 , 赵琨 , 王世宇 . 高通量血液透析对比低通量血液透析临床效果Meta 分析[J]. 中国血液净化, 2020 , 19(12) : 824 -828 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2020.12.008

Abstract

【Abstract】Objective To assess the effect of high flux hemodialysis (HFHD) and low flux heamodialysis (LFHD) on end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients by Meta analysis. Methods The randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs which compared HFHD with LFHD in ESRD patients were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang electronic databases. RevMan5.3 was used for meta analysis. Results A total of 22 studies were included that involved 7,590 participants with ESRD. Meta analysis results showed that all-cause mortality was lower in the participants using HFHD than in those using LFHD (RR= 0.766, 95% CI: 0.659~0.890, P<0.001). Compared with the LFHD group, the HFHD group showed better outcomes in cardiovascular mortality (RR=0.792, 95% CI: 0.696~0.901, P<0.001), beta-2 microglobulin (MD=-10.235, 95% CI: -12.475~ -7.994, P<0.001), lipid profiles (total cholesterol: MD=-0.244, 95% CI: -0.446~- 0.041, P=0.020; triglycerides: MD=- 0.248, 95% CI: - 0.406~- 0.090, P=0.002) and inflammation markers (SMD=-0.225, 95% CI: -0.340~-0.110, P<0.001). Conclusion Compared the patients using LFHD, ESRD patients using HFHD had lower mortality and cardiovascular mortality with better clearance effects for lipids, middle molecular substances and inflammation factors, bringing more benefits to ESRD patients.

参考文献

[1]Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, et al.Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives[J].Lancet, 2013, 382(9888):260-72
[2]Zhang L, Zhao M H, Zuo L, et al.China Kidney Disease Network (CK-NET) 2015 Annual Data Report[J].Kidney Int Suppl, 2019, 9(1):e1-e81
[3] Kim H W, Kim S H, Kim Y O, et al.Comparison of the impact of high-flux dialysis on mortality in hemodialysis patients with and without residual renal function[J].PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(6):e97184
[4]Bi H, Zhang M, Zhang Y, et al.Influence of high flux hemodialysis on C-reactive protein and lipids metabolism[J].Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research, 2010, 14(25):4689-4692
[5]Cheung A K, Agodoa L Y, Daugirdas J T, et al.Effects of hemodialyzer reuse on clearances of urea and beta2-microglobulinThe Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group[J].J Am Soc Nephrol, 1999, 10(1):117-27
[6]Eknoyan G, Beck G J, Cheung A K, et al.Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis[J].N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(25):2010-9
[7]Locatelli F, Martin-Malo A, Hannedouche T, et al.Effect of membrane permeability on survival of hemodialysis patients[J].J Am Soc Nephrol, 2009, 20(3):645-54
[8]Locatelli F, Mastrangelo F, Redaelli B, et al.Effects of different membranes and dialysis technologies on patient treatment tolerance and nutritional parametersThe Italian Cooperative Dialysis Study Group[J].Kidney international, 1996, 50(4):1293-1302
[9]Kuchle C, Fricke H, Held E, et al.High-flux hemodialysis postpones clinical manifestation of dialysis-related amyloidosis[J].Am J Nephrol, 1996, 16(6):484-8
[10]Li P K, Cheng Y L, Leung C B, et al.Effect of membrane permeability on inflammation and arterial stiffness: a randomized trial[J].Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010, 5(4):652-8
[11]Asci G, Tz H, Ozkahya M, et al.The impact of membrane permeability and dialysate purity on cardiovascular outcomes[J].J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013, 24(6):1014-23
[12]Ayli M, Ayli D, Azak A, et al.The effect of high-flux hemodialysis on dialysis-associated amyloidosis[J].Ren Fail, 2005, 27(1):31-4
[13]Blankestijn P J, Vos P F, Rabelink T J, et al.High-flux dialysis membranes improve lipid profile in chronic hemodialysis patients[J].J Am Soc Nephrol, 1995, 5(9):1703-8
[14]Chu P L, Chiu Y L, Lin J W, et al.Effects of low- and high-flux dialyzers on oxidative stress and insulin resistance[J].Blood Purif, 2008, 26(2):213-20
[15]House A A, Wells G A, Donnelly J G, et al.Randomized trial of high-flux vs low-flux haemodialysis: effects on homocysteine and lipids[J].Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2000, 15(7):1029-34
[16]Locatelli F, Andrulli S, Pecchini F, et al.Effect of high-flux dialysis on the anaemia of haemodialysis patients[J].Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2000, 15(9):1399-409
[17]Ottosson P, Attman P O, Knight C, et al.Do high-flux dialysis membranes affect renal dyslipidemia?[J].Asaio j, 2001, 47(3):229-34
[18] Goldberg I J, Kaufman A M, Lavarias V A, et al.High flux dialysis membranes improve plasma lipoprotein profiles in patients with end-stage renal disease[J].Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1996, 11(suppl2):104-7
[19]Gardinali M, Calcagno A, Conciato L, et al.Complement activation in dialysis: effects on cytokines,lymphocyte activation and beta 2 microglobulin[J].Int J Artif Organs, 1994, 17(6):337-44
[20]Klemm A, Franke C, Busch M, et al.Influence of hemodialysis membrane permeability on serum levels of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and homocysteine metabolites[J].Clin Nephrol, 2004, 61(3):191-7
[21]班遵浦, 罗国鸿, 陈彤.高通量透析的效果及对患者生存率的影响[J].中国现代医学杂志, 2017, 27(11):125-128
[22] 陈玉琼, 王娟, 方华, et al.高通量血液透析与常规血液透析对慢性肾功能衰竭尿毒症期患者的疗效比较[J].疑难病杂志, 2015, 14(9):932-935
[23]何志红, 易建伟, 袁峰.高通量血液透析和常规血液透析对尿毒症患者血脂代谢的影响[J].实验与检验医学, 2016, 34(6):770-771
[24]兰薇, 周结学, 许凤英.高通量血液透析与常规血液透析的临床疗效比较研究[J].中国医药导刊, 2013, 15(02):262-263
[25]张以勤, 纪美玉, 刘小平.高通量血液透析与低通量血液透析的透析效果比较[J].国际泌尿系统杂志, 2010, 30(5):619-621
[26]易晔, 卢远航, 冀倩倩.高通量血液透析对糖尿病肾病透析患者氧化应激及微炎症状态的影响[J].重庆医学, 2015, 44(19):2667-2669
[27]陈伟, 崔天蕾, 谢林伸.不同血液净化方式对维持性血液透析患者微炎症状态和营养状态的影响[J].中国老年学杂志, 2015, 35(02):379-380
[28]Gejyo F, Kawaguchi Y, Hara S, et al.Arresting dialysis-related amyloidosis: a prospective multicenter controlled trial of direct hemoperfusion with a beta2-microglobulin adsorption column[J].Artif Organs, 2004, 28(4):371-80
[29]Kim Y W, Park S.Confronting Practical Problems for Initiation of On-line Hemodiafiltration Therapy[J].Electrolyte Blood Press, 2016, 14(1):1-4
[30]Oruckaptan H, Karli O?uz K, I?ikay I, et al.Amyloidoma of the temporal bone and upper cervical spine; presentation of a rare clinical entity with a brief literature review[J].Turk Neurosurg, 2009, 19(2):159-62
[31]Vandenbroucke J M, Jadoul M, Maldague B, et al.Possible role of dialysis membrane characteristics in amyloid osteoarthropathy[J].Lancet, 1986, 1(8491):1210-1
[32]Zhao S, Wang Y, Mu Y, et al.Prevalence of dyslipidaemia in patients treated with lipid-lowering agents in China: results of the DYSlipidemia International Study (DYSIS)[J].Atherosclerosis, 2014, 235(2):463-9
[33]Ishimitsu T, Nakano N, Sudo Y, et al.Predictive significance of blood pressure values for the incidence of cardiovascular events in chronic hemodialysis patients[J].Hypertens Res, 2008, 31(9):1703-9
[34]Mcintyre C W.Effects of hemodialysis on cardiac function[J].Kidney Int, 2009, 76(4):371-5
[35]Elshamaa M F, Sabry S, Nabih M, et al.Oxidative stress markers and C-reactive protein in pediatric patients on hemodialysis[J].Ann Nutr Metab, 2009, 55(4):309-16
[36]Locatelli F, Gauly A, Czekalski S, et al.The MPO Study: just a European HEMO Study or something very different?[J].Blood Purif, 2008, 26(1):100-4
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]