[an error occurred while processing this directive]
护理研究

PDCA 循环管理对基层医院维持性血液透析患者矿物质代谢及营养指标改善的疗效观察

  • 舒亮辉 ,
  • 朝亚
展开
  • 1苏州大学附属无锡市第九人民医院肾内科

收稿日期: 2020-10-22

  修回日期: 2021-01-02

  网络出版日期: 2021-05-06

基金资助

无锡市青年科研项目(Q201753)

Effect of PDCA (Plan, Do, Check and Action) cycle management on the improvement of mineral metabolism and nutritional indexes in maintenance hemodialysis patients treated in the primary hospitals

  • SHU Liang-Hui ,
  • CHAO Ya
Expand
  • 1Blood Purification Center, Wuxi Nineth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi 214044, China

Received date: 2020-10-22

  Revised date: 2021-01-02

  Online published: 2021-05-06

摘要

【摘要】目的探讨PDCA[即计划(Plan)、实施(Do)、检查(Check)、处理(Aciton)]循环管理对基层医院维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis,MHD)患者矿物质代谢及营养指标改善的作用及其认知的影响,提高MHD 患者的透析质量管理。方法研究选取苏州大学附属无锡市第九人民医院血液净化中心MHD患者98例,随机分为常规宣教组46 例,PDCA 循环管理组52 例。比较干预前后2 组矿物质代谢及营养指标达标率、营养不良-炎症评分(malnutrition inflammation score, MIS)及钙磷代谢与营养相关知识的掌握情况。结果干预18个月后,PDCA循环管理组患者血红蛋白、血磷、全段甲状旁腺素(intact parathyroid hormone, iPTH)达标率分别为71.15%、59.62%、53.85%,均高于常规宣教组的45.65%、34.78%、23.91%(c2=6.571、6.031、9.138,P=0.010、0.014、0.003);PDCA 循环管理组患者MIS 评分明显下降(t=-2.926,P=0.005),而常规宣教组无明显变化(t=1.284, P=0.206),干预后2 组MIS 评分比较有统计学差异(t=- 3.226,P=0.002);2 组患者钙磷代谢及营养相关知识调查问卷得分均提升(t=-11.395、-16.299, 均P<0.001),干预后PDCA 管理组调查问卷得分明显优于常规宣教组(t=4.906, P<0.001)。结论PDCA 循环管理模式可有效改善基层医院MHD 患者的矿物质代谢水平及营养状况,提升患者自我管理意识,有利于改善预后,提高患者生活质量。

本文引用格式

舒亮辉 , 朝亚 . PDCA 循环管理对基层医院维持性血液透析患者矿物质代谢及营养指标改善的疗效观察[J]. 中国血液净化, 2021 , 20(05) : 351 -355 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2021.05.016

Abstract

【Abstract】Objective To investigate the effect of PDCA (Plan, Do, Check and Action) cycle management on the improvement of mineral metabolism and nutritional indexes and cognition of the patients, in order to increase the hemodialysis quality management in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients treated in the primary hospitals. Methods A total of 98 patients undergoing MHD in the Blood Purification Center of Wuxi Nineth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University were recruited and randomly divided into the routine health education group (n=46), and the PDCA cycle management group (n=52). The compliance rates of mineral metabolism and nutritional indexes, malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS), and knowledge of the patients about calcium and phosphorus metabolism and nutrition were compared before and after the intervention. Results After intervention for 18 months, the compliance rates of hemoglobin, serum phosphorus and parathyroid hormone were 71.15%, 59.62% and 53.85% respectively in the PDCA cycle management group, higher than those of 45.65%, 34.78% and 23.91% respectively in the routine health education group (c2=6.571, 6.031 and 9.138 respectively, P=0.010, 0.014 and 0.003 respectively). MIS score decreased significantly in the PDCA cycle management group (t=-2.926, P=0.005), but had no significant change in the routine health education group (t=1.284, P=0.206). MIS scores after the intervention were statistically different
between the two groups (t=-3.226, P=0.002). The scores of patients’knowledge about calcium and phosphorus metabolism and nutrition were improved in both groups (t=-11.395 and -16.299, P<0.001). After the intervention, the scores were significantly better in the PDCA cycle management group than in the routine health education group (t=4.906, P<0.001). Conclusion The PDCA cycle management mode can effectively improve the mineral metabolism and nutritional status, the awareness of selfmanagement, the quality of life and their prognosis in MHD patients treated in primary hospitals.

参考文献

[1]陈胜男,申燕.慢性肾脏病的心血管并发症研究进展[J].中国病理生理杂志,2019,35(8):1532-1536.
[2]Venuthurupalli S K , Hoy W E , Healy H G , et al. CKD Screening and Surveillance in Australia: Past, Present, and Future[J]. Kidney International Reports, 2018, 3(1):36-46.
[3]杨沿浪,周伟,张道友, 等.不同性别高尿酸血症与慢性肾脏病的相关研究[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2018,26(8):825-830.
[4]陈佩娜, 吴宝林, 胡润月, 等. 终末期肾病患者认知功能损害与脑局部一致性的相关性研究[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2019, 18(1):55-60.
[5]蔡士铭, 赵慧萍, 王梅. 终末期肾脏病透析患者血镁水平异常的研究进展[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2019, 35(1):59-63.
[6]庄新鸿,李文栋,陈文, 等.复方-α酮酸联合血液净化治疗终末期肾功能衰竭血透患者钙磷代谢紊乱的疗效观察[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2017,32(12):1421-423.
[7]Middleton J P , Wolf M . Second Chances to Improve ESRD Outcomes With a Second-Generation Calcimimetic[J]. Jama, 2017, 317(2):139.
[8]郑松娅,朱聆香,汪蔚, 等.PDCA循环管理在急诊医院感染预防与控制中的应用研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2019,29(12):1873-1876,1881.
[9]黄馨瑶,李雪玉,赵文静, 等.基于PDCA循环模式构建急诊重症监护室患者标准化风险管理体系[J].现代预防医学,2019,46(10):1816-1819,1824.
[10]谭兵,吴燕,杨晓亮, 等.PDCA循环在血浆合理输注中的应用[J].中国输血杂志,2018,31(6):680-682.
[11]盛晓华,汪年松.美国肾脏病基金会肾脏病预后质量倡议工作组血液透析充分性临床实践指南(2015年更新版)解读[J].世界临床药物,2016,37(8):508-512.
[12]王莉,李贵森,刘志红.中华医学会肾脏病学分会《慢性肾脏病矿物质和骨异常诊治指导》[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2013,22(6):554-559.
[13]Investigators C S . Cognitive Impairment in Non-Dialysis-Dependent CKD and the Transition to Dialysis: Findings From the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study[J]. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2018,72(4):499-508.
[14]姚淑琴,张红娟,胡中华, 等.慢性肾功能衰竭患者腹膜透析期间腹腔感染的影响因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2019,29(5):684-686.
[15]Mario Cozzolino. CKD-MBD KDIGO guidelines: how difficult is reaching the ‘target’?[J]. Clinical Kidney Journal, 2018, 11(1):70-72.
[16]Sven-Jean Tan, Michael MX Cai. Is there a role for newer biomarkers in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder management?: CKD-MBD Biomarkers[J]. Nephrology, 2017, 22(113):14-18.
[17]张晓宇,王平,刘爱峰, 等.骨硬化蛋白与DKK1蛋白在慢性肾脏病-矿物质骨代谢紊乱中的研究进展[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2019,25(2):237-241.
[18]段绍霞, 蔡宏, 张伟明. 维持性血液透析患者营养不良-炎症复合体综合征与预后的关系研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2015, 35(12):1851.
[19]刘洁琼, 王景福. 老年维持性血液透析患者穿透素3与超敏C反应蛋白和营养不良的关系[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2019, 40(6):654-657.
[20]何俊,吴丽民.PDCA循环护理对维持性血液透析患者高钾血症的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2019,23(5):114-117.



文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]