[an error occurred while processing this directive]
临床研究

终末期肾病患者腹主动脉钙化和心脏瓣膜钙化的临床特点及危险因素的差异分析

  • 马晓迎 ,
  • 生玉平 ,
  • 杨星梦 ,
  • 王娜 ,
  • 张浩然 ,
  • 徐海平 ,
  • 孙福云
展开
  • 1沧州市中心医院肾内科

收稿日期: 2021-03-02

  修回日期: 2021-04-26

  网络出版日期: 2021-07-21

基金资助

河北省沧州市重点研发计划指导项目(204106081)

Clinical characteristics and related factors of abdominal aorta and cardiac valve calcification in end stage renal disease patients 

  • MA Xiao-Ying ,
  • SHENG Yu-Ping ,
  • YANG Xing-Meng ,
  • WANG Na ,
  • ZHANG Hao-Ran ,
  • XU Hai-Ping ,
  • SUN Fu-Yun
Expand
  • 1Department of Nephrology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou 061000, China

Received date: 2021-03-02

  Revised date: 2021-04-26

  Online published: 2021-07-21

摘要

【摘要】目的评估终末期肾病(end stage renal failure,ESRD)患者腹主动脉钙化(aorta abdominalis calcification, AAC)和心脏瓣膜钙化(cardiac valve calcification,CVC)情况及影响因素差异。方法选取2019 年10 月~2020 年12 月沧州市中心医院肾内科ESRD 患者共277名,根据AAC积分、CVC情况分为AAC和非AAC组、CVC和非CVC组、AAC 及CVC组和非AAC及非CVC组,比较其临床特点,分析影响因素。结果  AAC组较非AAC组患者老年、女性、合并糖尿病,冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病 (coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, CHD)、腹膜透析患者、CVC比例高,C反应蛋白(CRP)显著升高(χ2/Z 值分别8.234、30.017、9.742、11.802、4.147、18.647、- 2.807,P值分别<0.001、<0.001、0.002、0.001、0.042、<0.001、0.005);CVC 组老年、合并糖尿病和CHD、舒张压、平均动脉压、血小板、AAC 积分明显升高(χ2/t 值分别- 6.527、16.091、13.670、- 4.271、- 3.456、- 2.761、- 5.132,P 值分别<0.001、<0.001、<0.001、<0.001、0.001、0.006、<0.001);同时AAC、CVC 组老年、合并糖尿病和CHD、舒张压、血磷明显升高(χ2/t 值分别-7.406、16.817、16.260、-4.285、-3.178,P 值分别<0.001、<0.001、<0.001、<0.001、0.001)。多元Logistic 回归分析显示,年龄(OR=1.088, 95% CI:1.061~1.115,P<0.001)和透析(OR=0.564, 95% CI:0.298~1.066, P=0.078)是AAC 的独立危险因素;年龄(OR=1.084, 95% CI:1.034~1.137, P=0.001),白细胞(OR=1.211,95% CI:0.990~1.469, P=0.051),既往糖尿病(OR=2.773, 95% CI:0.941~8.157, P=0.060)和CHD(OR=2.958, 95% CI:0.942~9.356, P=0.073),AAC 积分(OR=1.173, 95% CI:1.037~1.334, P=0.012)是CVC的独立危险因素;年龄(OR=1.155,95% CI:1.071~1.263,P<0.001)和腹膜透析(OR= 31.102, 95% CI: 2.275~424.511, P=0.010)是同时AAC 和CVC 的独立危险因素。结论ESRD 患者AAC 和CVC 相互关联,但临床特征和影响因素不同,需在临床上重点防治、侧重管理。

本文引用格式

马晓迎 , 生玉平 , 杨星梦 , 王娜 , 张浩然 , 徐海平 , 孙福云 . 终末期肾病患者腹主动脉钙化和心脏瓣膜钙化的临床特点及危险因素的差异分析[J]. 中国血液净化, 2021 , 20(07) : 460 -464 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2021.07.007

Abstract

【Abstract】Objective To assess the status and related factors of abdominal aorta calcification (AAC) and cardiac valve calcification (CVC) in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Methods A total of 277 ESRD patients admitted to the Department of Nephrology, Cangzhou Central Hospital from October, 2019 to December, 2020 were enrolled in this study. They were divided into AAC group and non-AAC group, CVC group and non-CVC group, AAC and CVC group and non-AAC and non-CVC group, based on AAC score and CVC status. Clinical characteristics and related factors were compared among the groups. Results The rates of elderly, female, diabetes, coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CHD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), CVC and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) level were significantly higher in AAC group than in non-AAC group (P<0.001, <0.001, =0.002, =0.001, =0.042, <0.001 and =0.005 respectively). More elderly, diabetes, CHD, and higher diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, platelet and AAC score were found in CVC group (P<0.001,<0.001,<0.001,<0.001, =0.001, =0.006 and <0.001 respectively). The rates of elderly, diabetes, CHD, higher diastolic blood pressure, higher serum phosphorus increased in AAC and CVC groups (P<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001 and =0.001 respectively). Multivariate logistic regression showed that age and dialysis were the independent risk factors for AAC, that age, white blood cell, history of diabetes and CHD, and AAC score were the independent risk factors for CVC, and that age and PD were the independent risk factors for both AAC and CVC. Conclusions AAC and CVC were clinically correlated. However, clinical characteristics and related factors of the two vascular calcifications were different. Active prevention, treatment and individualized management are required.

参考文献

1. Vervloet, M. and M. Cozzolino, Vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease: different bricks in the wall? Kidney Int, 2017. 91(4): p. 808-817.
2. Komatsu, M., et al., Aortic arch calcification predicts cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Kidney Blood Press Res, 2014. 39(6): p. 658-67.
3. Liu, Z.H. and G. China Dialysis Calcification Study, Vascular calcification burden of Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease: methodology of a cohor t study. BMC Nephrol, 2015. 16: p. 129.
4. Demer, L.L. and Y. Tintut, Vascular calcification: pathobiology of a multifaceted disease. Circulation, 2008. 117(22): p. 2938-48.
5. Smith, E.R., Vascular Calcification in Uremia: New-Age Concepts about an Old-Age Problem. Methods Mol Biol, 2016. 1397: p. 175-208.
6. Ochi, H. and S. Takeda, [Bone metabolism and cardiovascular function update. Nerve system and mutual interaction between bone and blood vessel]. Clin Calcium, 2014. 24(7): p. 77-83.
7. Suchowierska, E. and M. My?liwiec, [Mineral and bone disturbances associated with chronic kidney disease]. Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego, 2010. 28(164): p. 138-143.
8. Erratum: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Update Work Group. KDIGO 2017 Clin ical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic K idney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int Suppl. 2017;7:1-59. Kidney Int Suppl (2011), 2017. 7(3): p. e1.
9. Levey, A.S., et al., National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med, 2003. 139(2): p. 137-47.
10. Kauppila, L.I., et al., New indices to classify location, severity and progression of calcific lesions in the abdominal aorta : a 25-year follow-up study. Atherosclerosis, 1997. 132(2): p. 245-50.
11. Liu, Z.H., et al., Prevalence and risk factors for vascular calcification in Chinese patients receiving dialysis: baseli ne results from a prospective cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin, 2018. 34(8): p. 1491-1500.
12. Ure?a-Torres, P., et al., Valvular heart disease and calcification in CKD: more common than appreciated. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2020. 35(12): p. 2046-2053.
13. Shroff, R.C., et al., Dialysis accelerates medial vascular calcification in part by triggering smooth muscle cell apoptosis. Circulation, 2008. 118(17): p. 1748-57.
14. Kim, H.G., et al., Risk factors for progression of aortic arch calcification in patients on maintenance hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Hemodial Int, 2011. 15(4): p. 460-7.
15. Jansz, T.T., et al., Coronary Artery Calcification in Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis. Am J Nephrol, 2018. 48(5): p. 369-377.
16. Simons, P.C., et al., Second manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) study: rationale and design. Eur J Epidemiol, 1999. 15(9): p. 773-81.
17. Akishita, M., et al., Association of plasma dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate levels with endothelial function in postmenopaus al women with coronary risk factors. Hypertens Res, 2008. 31(1): p. 69-74.
18. Ternacle, J., et al., Chronic Kidney Disease and the Pathophysiology of Valvular Heart Disease. Can J Cardiol, 2019. 35(9): p. 1195-1207.
19. Voelkl, J., et al., Signaling pathways involved in vascular smooth muscle cell calcification during hyperphosphatemia. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2019. 76(11): p. 2077-2091.
20. Plytzanopoulou, P., et al., Malnutrition as a risk factor for cardiac valve calcification in patients under maintenance dialysis: a cross-sectional study. Int Urol Nephrol, 2020. 52(11): p. 2205-2212.
21. Bellasi, A., et al., Cardiac valve calcification is a marker of vascular disease in prevalent hemodialysis patients . J Nephrol, 2012. 25(2): p. 211-8.
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]