[an error occurred while processing this directive]
综述

血液净化清除硫酸吲哚酚的研究进展

  • 陈爽 ,
  • 白风霞 ,
  • 吴祯 ,
  • 张海松
展开
  • 1河北大学附属医院肾内科
    2河北大学临床医学院

收稿日期: 2021-10-08

  修回日期: 2021-11-02

  网络出版日期: 2022-03-16

基金资助

河北省自然科学基金资助项目(H2018201289)

Research progress in the removal of indoxyl sulfate by blood purification

  • CHEN Shuang ,
  • BAI Feng-Xia ,
  • WU Zhen ,
  • ZHANG Hai-Song
Expand
  • 1Department of Nephrology, the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China; 2School of Clinical Medicine, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China

Received date: 2021-10-08

  Revised date: 2021-11-02

  Online published: 2022-03-16

摘要

【摘要】硫酸吲哚酚(indoxyl sulfate,IS)是一种典型的尿毒症毒素,由肠道菌群分解色氨酸后经过一系列代谢形成,与血浆白蛋白结合率高达90%以上。在慢性肾脏病(chronic kidney disease,CKD)中,由于肾功能受损,导致IS 不能有效经肾小管分泌排出体外而蓄积。越来越多的证据表明,IS 在CKD并发症的发生发展中起关键作用,且与预后相关。因此如何有效清除IS 显得尤为重要,现对近几年围绕血液净化清除IS的研究做一总结。

本文引用格式

陈爽 , 白风霞 , 吴祯 , 张海松 . 血液净化清除硫酸吲哚酚的研究进展[J]. 中国血液净化, 2022 , 21(03) : 191 -193 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2022.03.011

Abstract

【Abstract】Indoxyl sulfate (IS), a typical uremia toxin, is the product of tryptophan decomposed by intestinal flora and then by a series of metabolic processes. Its binding rate with plasma albumin was more than 90%. In chronic kidney disease (CKD), IS cannot be effectively secreted and excreted through the impaired renal tubules. More evidences have shown that IS plays a key role in the presence and development of uremic complications and is also related to the prognosis of uremic patients. Therefore, the clearance of IS is particularly important. Here we summarize the recent advances in the clearance of IS by blood purification.

参考文献

[1] Hill NR, Fatoba ST, Oke JL, et al. Global prevalence of chronic kidney disease – A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(7): e0158765.
[2] Lin CN, Wu IW, Huang YF, et al. Measuring serum total and free indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate in chronic kidney disease using UPLC-MS/MS[J]. J. Food Drug Anal, 2019, 27(2): 502–509.
[3] Holle J, Kirchner M, Okun J, et al. Serum indoxyl sulfate concentrations associate with progression of chronic kidney disease in children[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(10): e0240446.
[4] Cheng TH, Ma MC, Liao MT, et al. Indoxyl sulfate, a tubular toxin, contributes to the development of chronic kidney disease[J]. Toxins, 2020, 12(11): 684.
[5] Li X, Lu Z, Zhou F, et al. Indoxyl sulfate promotes the atherosclerosis through up-regulating the miR-34a expression in endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro[J]. Vasc. Pharmacol, 2020, 131: 106763.
[6] Zhang H, Chen J, Shen Z, et al. Indoxyl sulfate accelerates vascular smooth muscle cell calcification via microRNA-29b dependent regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling[J]. Toxicol. Lett, 2018, 284: 29–36.
[7] Six I, Flissi N, Lenglet G, et al. Uremic toxins and vascular dysfunction[J]. Toxins, 2020, 12(6): 404.
[8] LIN YT, WU PH, LIANG SS, et al. Protein-bound uremic toxins are associated with cognitive function among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis[J]. Sci. Rep, 2019, 9(1): 20388.
[9] Liu WC, Wu CC, Lim PS, et al. Effect of uremic toxin-indoxyl sulfate on the skeletal system[J]. Clin. Chim. Acta, 2018, 484: 197–206.
[10] Van Der Made TK, Fedecostante M, Scotcher D, et al. Quantitative translation of microfluidic transporter in vitro data to in vivo reveals impaired albumin-facilitated indoxyl sulfate secretion in chronic kidney disease[J]. Mol. Pharm, 2019, 16(11): 4551–4562.
[11] Nishi K, Sakurama K, Watanabe H, et al. Effects of uremic toxins on the binding of aripiprazole to human serum albumin[J]. Biol. Pharm. Bull, 2021, 44(3): 437–441.
[12] Smith J, Pfaendtner J. Elucidating the molecular interactions between uremic toxins and the sudlow II binding site of human serum albumin[J]. J. Phys. Chem. B, Am. Chem. Soc, 2020, 124(19): 3922–3930.
[13] Shi Y, Tian H, Wang Y, et al. Effect of Ionic strength, pH and chemical displacers on the percentage protein binding of protein-bound uremic toxins[J]. Blood Purif, 2019, 47(4): 351–360.
[14] Tao X, Thijssen S, Kotanko P, et al. Improved dialytic removal of protein-bound uraemic toxins with use of albumin binding competitors: an in vitro human whole blood study[J]. Sci. Rep, 2016, 6(1): 23389.
[15] Madero M, Cano KB, Campos I, et al. Removal of protein-bound uremic toxins during hemodialysis using a binding competitor[J]. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol, 2019, 14(3): 394–402.
[16] Maheshwari V, Thijssen S, Tao X, et al. In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition[J]. Sci. Rep, 2019, 9(1): 909.
[17] Hy?pler R, Tichá A, ?afránek R, et al. Indoxyl sulfate elimination in renal replacement therapy: Influence of Citrate- versus acetate-buffering component during bicarbonate dialysis[J]. Dis. Markers, 2018, 2018: 1–7.
[18] Yamamoto S, Sasahara K, Domon M, et al. pH-dependent protein binding properties of uremic toxins in vitro[J]. Toxins, 2021, 13(2): 116.
[19] Yen SC, Liu ZW, Juang RS, et al. Carbon nanotube/conducting polymer hybrid nanofibers as novel organic bioelectronic interfaces for efficient removal of protein-bound uremic toxins[J]. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(47): 43843–43856.
[20] 彭海萍, 吴广礼. 不同血液净化方法对维持性血液透析患者毒素清除力的影响分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(05): 757-759+800.
[21] Gomó?ka M, Niemczyk L, Szamotulska K, et al. Protein-bound solute clearance during hemodialysis[J]. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol , 2019,1153: 69–77.
[22] Heri? T, Vivoda T, Bogataj ?, et al. Medium cut-off dialysis membrane and dietary fiber effects on inflammation and protein-bound uremic toxins: a systematic review and protocol for an interventional study[J]. Toxins, 2021, 13(4): 244.
[23] 刘书馨, 肖佳, 单婧, 等. 不同血液透析方式对大鼠体内硫酸吲哚酚清除影响的研究[J]. 中国血液净化, 2020, 19(11): 760–763.
[24] REDERT Study Group, Panichi V, Rocchetti M T, et al. Long term variation of serum levels of uremic toxins in patients treated by post-dilution high volume on-line hemodiafiltration in comparison to standard low-flux bicarbonate dialysis: results from the REDERT study[J]. J. Nephrol, 2017, 30(4): 583–591.
[25] Thammathiwat T, Tiranathanagul K, Limjariyakul M, et al. Super high‐flux hemodialysis provides comparable effectiveness with high‐volume postdilution online hemodiafiltration in removing protein‐bound and middle‐molecule uremic toxins: A prospective cross‐over randomized controlled trial[J]. Ther. Apheresis Dial, 2021, 25(1): 73–81.
[26] Paats J, Adoberg A, Arund J, et al. Serum levels and removal by haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration of tryptophan-derived uremic toxins in ESKD patients[J]. Int. J. Mol. Sci, 2020, 21(4): 1522.
[27] Murtas S, Aquilani R, Deiana ML, et al. Differences in amino acid loss between high-efficiency hemodialysis and postdilution and predilution hemodiafiltration using high convection volume exchange—a new metabolic scenario? A pilot study[J]. J. Renal Nutr, 2019, 29(2): 126–135.
[28] Oh WC, Mafrici B, Rigby M, et al. Micronutrient and amino acid losses during renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury[J]. Kidney Int. Rep, 2019, 4(8): 1094–1108.
[29] Li J, Han L, Liu S, et al. Removal of indoxyl sulfate by water-soluble poly-cyclodextrins in dialysis[J]. Colloids Surf, B, 2018, 164: 406–413.
[30] Pavlenko D, Giasafaki D, Charalambopoulou G, et al. Carbon adsorbents with dual porosity for efficient removal of uemic toxins and cytokines from human plasma[J]. Sci. Rep, 2017, 7(1): 14914.
[31] Sternkopf M, Thor?e-Boveleth S, Beck T, et al. A bifunctional adsorber particle for the removal of hydrophobic uremic toxins from whole blood of renal failure patients[J]. Toxins, 2019, 11(7): 389.
[32] Shi Y, Wang Y, Ma S, et al. Increasing the removal of protein‐bound uremic toxins by liposome‐supported hemodialysis[J]. Artif. Organs, 2019, 43(5): 490–503.
[33] Shi Y, Tian H, Wang Y, et al. Removal of protein-bound uremic toxins by liposome-supported peritoneal dialysis[J]. Peritoneal Dial. Int, 2019, 39(6): 509–518.
[34] Shen Y, Wang Y, Shi Y, et al. Improving the clearance of protein-bound uremic toxins using cationic liposomes as an adsorbent in dialysate[J]. Colloids Surf, B, 2020, 186: 110725.
[35] Lu L, Yeow JTW. An adsorption study of indoxyl sulfate by zeolites and polyethersulfone–zeolite composite membranes[J]. Mater. Des, 2017, 120: 328–335.
[36] Raharjo Y, Fahmi MZ, Wafiroh S, et al. Incorporation of imprinted-zeolite to polyethersulfone/cellulose acetate membrane for creatinine removal in hemodialysis treatment[J]. J. Teknol, 2019, 81(3): 137-144.
[37] Sasaki M, Liu Y, Ebara M. Zeolite composite nanofiber mesh for indoxyl sulfate adsorption toward wearable blood purification devices[J]. Fibers, 2021, 9(6): 37.
[38] Gryp T, De Paepe K, Vanholder R, et al. Gut microbiota generation of protein-bound uremic toxins and related metabolites is not altered at different stages of chronic kidney disease[J]. Kidney Int ,2020, 97(6): 1230–1242.
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]