[an error occurred while processing this directive]
临床研究

不同定义下透析中低血压与血液透析患者全因死亡的相关性研究

  • 曹虎男 ,
  • 樊蕊 ,
  • 孔凌 ,
  • 成水芹 ,
  • 陈艺虹 ,
  • 吕桂兰
展开
  • 210002 南京, 1东部战区总医院国家肾脏疾病临床医学研究中心血液净化中心
    210093 南京, 
    2南京大学医学院

收稿日期: 2022-03-28

  修回日期: 2022-06-02

  网络出版日期: 2022-09-06

基金资助

东部战区总医院院管课题(YYHL2021062)

A comparative study on the association of all-cause mortality with different definitions of intradialytic hypotension

  • CAO Hu-Nan ,
  • FAN Rui ,
  • KONG Ling ,
  • CHENG Shui-Qin ,
  • CHEN Yi-Hong ,
  • CHEN Yi-Hong Gui-Lan
Expand
  • Center of Blood Purification, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Diseases, General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Nanjing 210002, China; 2Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Received date: 2022-03-28

  Revised date: 2022-06-02

  Online published: 2022-09-06

摘要

目的 比较不同定义下透析中低血压(intradialytic hypotension,IDH)与维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis,MHD)患者全因死亡的关系。 方法 回顾分析407名MHD患者数据,基于9 种不同定义选择K-M曲线差异最大时的IDH发生率作为截断值以区分频发IDH组与非频发IDH组,利用COX回归模型对比频发IDH与全因死亡的关联,同时通过C指数(C-index)、赤池信息准则(Akaike information criterion,AIC)、净重新分类指数(net reclassification index,NRI)和综合判别改善指数(integrated discrimination improvement,IDI)评价模型拟合效果及性能,最后利用限制性立方样条回归探讨IDH发生率与全因死亡的剂量-反应关系。 结果 近56个月的观察期内共收集了198 883次透析数据,最终35名(8.6%)患者死亡,平均死亡率为2.6人/100人年。各定义下从未发生过IDH的人数比例从0到46.4%不等,IDH平均发生率从0.7%到46.0%不等。矫正混杂变量后,基于英国肾脏协会指南定
义的频发IDH与全因死亡相关(
HR=6.762,95%CI:3.272~13.977,P<0.001),模型C-ndex=0.749,AIC=380.957,NRI=0.381,IDI=0.093;IDH 发 生 率 与 全 因 死 亡 风 险 存 在 非 线 性 关 系 (Wald χ2=3.875,P=0.049)。 结论 IDH发生较普遍,在各定义间差异较大,重新界定后的IDH频发率在各定义间的差异有所减小。英国肾脏病协会指南定义下患者全因死亡风险随IDH发生频率增加而上升,频发IDH与全因死亡显著相关,且模型拟合效果及性能最优,能较好的评估死亡风险,在临床中更具有预测和指导意义。

本文引用格式

曹虎男 , 樊蕊 , 孔凌 , 成水芹 , 陈艺虹 , 吕桂兰 . 不同定义下透析中低血压与血液透析患者全因死亡的相关性研究[J]. 中国血液净化, 2022 , 21(09) : 638 -643 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2022.09.004

Abstract

Objective To compare the association between intradialytic hypotension (IDH) using different definitions and all- cause mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Methods Data from 407 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The K-M curves based on the 9 different definitions were established, and the cutoff value for the incidence of IDH with maximum difference in the K-M curve was used to distinguish frequent IDH from non-frequent IDH. Cox proportional hazard regression model was conducted to compare the correlation between frequent IDH and all-cause mortality. C-index, Akaike Information Criterion(AIC), Net Reclassification Index (NRI) and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate efficiency and quality of the model. Finally, the dose-response effect between the frequency of IDH and allcause mortality was explored by strict cubic spline regression. Results A total of 198,883 dialysis data were collected during the 56-month follow-up period, and 35 patients (8.6%) died with an average death rate of 2.6 per 100 person-years. The proportion of never having IDH using an IDH definition ranged from 0% to 46.4%, and the average incidence of IDH ranged from 0.7% to 46.0%. After adjusting for confounding variables, frequent IDH that defined by the British Kidney Association (UKKA) guidelines was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR=6.762, 95% CI:3.27213.977, P0.001). The C-index, AIC, NRI and IDI of the model were 0.749, 380.957, 0.381 and 0.093 respectively; there was a significant non-linear relationship between the frequency of IDH and the risk of all- cause mortality (Wald χ2=3.875, P=0.049). Conclusion
IDH is common, and its incidence varies using different definitions. Redefinition of IDH may reduce the variation. Using the UKKA guidelines, the risk of all-cause mortality increased with the frequency of IDH. Frequent IDH was significantly associated with all-cause mortality, which is closely related to clinical practice to reveal the association between IDH and all-cause mortality.

参考文献

[1]Reeves P B, Mc C F.Mechanisms,Clinical Implications,and Treatment of Intradialytic Hypotension[J].Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2018, 13(8):1297-1303 [2]. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients[J].American journal of kidney diseases, 2005, 4(45):1-153 [3]Kooman J, Basci A, Pizzarelli F, et al.EBPG guideline on haemodynamic instability[J].Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2007, 22(Supplement 2):i22-i44 [4]Hirakata H, Nitta K, Inaba M, et al.Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Guidelines for Management of Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis[J].Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 2012, 16(5):387-435 [5]Mactier R, Hoenich Ph.D N,Breen CRenal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on Haemodialysis[J].Nephron Clinical Practice, 2011, 118(s1):c241-c286 [6]Kuipers J, Verboom L M, Ipema K J R, et al.The Prevalence of Intradialytic Hypotension in Patients on Conventional Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis[J].American Journal of Nephrology, 2019, 49(6):497-506 [7]Flythe J E, Xue H, Lynch K E, et al.Association of mortality risk with various definitions of intradialytic hypotension[J].Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2015, 26(3):724-734 [8]Chou J A, Streja E, Nguyen D V, et al.Intradialytic hypotension,blood pressure changes and mortality risk in incident hemodialysis patients[J].Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2018, 33(1):149-159 [9]Shoji T, Tsubakihara Y, Fujii M, et al.Hemodialysis-associated hypotension as an independent risk factor for two-year mortality in hemodialysis patients[J].Kidney Int, 2004, 66(3):1212-1220 [10]Yu J, Liu Z, Shen B, et al.Intradialytic Hypotension as an Independent Risk Factor for Long-Term Mortality in Maintaining Hemodialysis Patients: A 5-Year Follow-Up Cohort Study[J].Blood Purification, 2018, 45(4):320-326 [11] Desquilbet L, Mariotti F.Dose-response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research[J].Statistics in Medicine, 2010, 29(9):1037-1057
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]