[an error occurred while processing this directive]
临床研究

血D-二聚体水平对腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎治疗失败的预测价值探讨

  • 孟冉 ,
  • 刘桂凌 ,
  • 陈晓莉 ,
  • 徐健
展开
  • 合肥 230601,1安徽医科大学第二附属医院肾脏内科

收稿日期: 2022-09-20

  修回日期: 2022-12-30

  网络出版日期: 2023-03-03

基金资助

安徽医科大学第二附属医院临床研究重点培育项目

The predictive value of serum D-dimer level on treatment failure of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis

  • MENG Ran ,
  • LIU Gui-Ling ,
  • CHEN Xiao-Li ,
  • XU Jian
Expand
  • Department of Nephrology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China

Received date: 2022-09-20

  Revised date: 2022-12-30

  Online published: 2023-03-03

Supported by

安徽医科大学第二附属医院临床研究重点培育项目(2021LCZD16)

摘要

目的  探讨治疗前D-二聚体对腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎(peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis,PDAP)治疗失败的预测价值。 方法  按照治疗效果把161例确诊为PDAP患者分为治疗成功组及治疗失败组,对2组患者的临床资料进行统计学比较,使用Logistic回归分析PDAP治疗失败的危险因素,运用受试者工作曲线(ROC)分析各危险因素对治疗失败的预测价值。 结果  治疗成功组的血清白蛋白(t=3.359,P=0.002)及首次腹膜炎发生率(χ2=6.155,P=0.013)明显高于治疗失败组,其透析龄(Z =-3.314,P=0.001)、第3天透出液白细胞计数(Z=-3.951,P<0.001)、hs-CRP(Z=-3.093,P=0.002)、PCT(Z=-2.344,P=0.019)、纤维蛋白原(Z=-2.197,P=0.024)、D-二聚体(Z=-4.152,P<0.001)低于治疗失败组。单因素Logistic分析显示长透析龄(OR=1.025,95% CI:1.011~1.039,P<0.001)、高hs-CRP(OR=1.007,95% CI:1.002~1.012,P=0.008)、高PCT(OR=1.018,95% CI:1.002~1.034,P=0.029)、高纤维蛋白原(OR=1.568,95% CI:1.052~2.336,P=0.027)、高D-二聚体(OR=1.523,95% CI:1.165~1.991,P=0.002)、低血清白蛋白(OR=0.0915,95% CI:0.840~0.997,P=0.043)是PDAP治疗失败的危险因素;多因素Logistic分析显示长透析龄(OR=1.024,95% CI:1.008~1.039,P=0.003)、高D-二聚体(OR=1.419,95% CI:1.064~1.893,P=0.017)是PDAP治疗失败的独立危险因素。对比ROC曲线,D-二聚体的曲线下面积最大,为0.801,灵敏度和特异度分别为72.2%和76.2%。 结论  PDAP患者长透析龄、治疗前高水平D-二聚体与治疗失败独立相关,D-二聚体是预测PDAP治疗失败的良好指标。

本文引用格式

孟冉 , 刘桂凌 , 陈晓莉 , 徐健 . 血D-二聚体水平对腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎治疗失败的预测价值探讨[J]. 中国血液净化, 2023 , 22(03) : 177 -181 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2023.03.005

Abstract

Objective  To investigate the predictive value of plasma D-dimer on the treatment failure of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP).  Methods  The clinical data of 161 patients diagnosed with PDAP were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into cured group and treatment failure group according to the treatment effect. The clinical data were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for the treatment failure of PDAP. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the predictive value of the risk factors for the treatment failure.  Results Serum albumin (t=3.359, P=0.002) and the first episode of PDAP (χ2=6.155, P=0.013) were significantly higher in the cured group than in the treatment failure group, while dialysis duration (Z=-3.314, P=0.001), leukocyte count in effluent dialysate at the 3rd day (Z=-3.951, P<0.001), hs-CRP (Z=-3.093, P=0.002), procalcitonin (PCT, Z=-2.344, P=0.019), fibrinogen (Z=-2.197, P=0.024) and D-dimer (Z=-4.152, P<0.001) were significantly lower in the cured group than in the treatment failure group. Univariate logistic regression showed that longer dialysis duration (OR=1.025, 95% CI:1.011~1.039, P<0.001), higher hs-CRP (OR=1.007, 95% CI:1.002~1.012, P=0.008), higher PCT (OR=1.018, 95% CI:1.002~1.034, P=0.029), higher fibrinogen (OR=1.568, 95% CI:1.052~2.336, P=0.027), higher D-dimer (OR=1.523, 95% CI:1.165~1.991, P=0.002) and lower serum albumin (OR=0.915, 95% CI:0.840~0.997, P=0.043) were the risk factors for treatment failure of PDAP. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that longer dialysis duration (OR=1.023, 95% CI:1.008~1.039, P=0.003) and higher D-dimer (OR=1.419, 95% CI:1.064~1.893, P=0.017) were the independent risk factors for treatment failure of PDAP. ROC curve showed that D-dimer level to predict the treatment failure of PDAP had the area under the curve of 0.801, the sensitivity of 72.2% and the specificity of 76.2%, better than the levels of hs-CRP, PCT, fibrinogen and serum albumin to predict the treatment failure.  Conclusions Longer peritoneal dialysis duration and higher D-dimer before treatment were independently correlated with the treatment failure of PDAP. Plasma D-dimer level was a better indicator to predict treatment failure of PDAP.

参考文献

[1]Mehrotra R, Devuyst O, Davies SJ, et al.The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis[J].J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016, 27(11):3238-3252 [2]van Diepen AT, van Esch S, Struijk DG, et al.The first peritonitis episode alters the natural course of peritoneal membrane characteristics in peritoneal dialysis patients[J].Perit Dial Int, 2015, 35(3):324-332 [3]Kumar VA, Sidell MA, Yang WT, et al.Predictors of peritonitis,hospital days,and technique survival for peritoneal dialysis patients in a managed care setting[J].Perit Dial Int, 2014, 34(2):171-178 [4]Al Sahlawi M, Zhao J, McCullough K, et al.Variation in Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis Outcomes in the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS)[J].Am J Kidney Dis, 2022, 79(1):45-55 [5]Weitz JI, Fredenburgh JC, Eikelboom JW.A Test in Context: D-Dimer[J].J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 70(19):2411-2420 [6]Li J, Zhou K, Duan H, et al.Value of D-dimer in predicting various clinical outcomes following community-acquired pneumonia: A network meta-analysis[J].PLoS One, 2022, 17(2):e0263215- [7]Schwameis M, Steiner MM, Schoergenhofer C, et al.D-dimer and histamine in early stage bacteremia: A prospective controlled cohort study[J].Eur J Intern Med, 2015, 26(10):782-786 [8]Li PK, Chow KM, Cho Y, et al.ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment[J].Perit Dial Int, 2022, 42(2):110-153 [9]Luyendyk JP, Schoenecker JG, Flick MJ.The multifaceted role of fibrinogen in tissue injury and inflammation[J].Blood, 2019, 133(6):511-520 [10]Xu H, Xie JW, Yang JL, et al.Role of D-dimer and Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].Orthop Surg, 2021, 13(3):692-700 [11]许亮亮, 黄杰, 桑玉玉.二聚体、检测与肺部感染严重程度及预后的关系[J].中华肺部疾病杂志电子版, 2022, 15(01):73-75 [12]Liu X, Qin A, Zhou H, et al.Novel Predictors and Risk Score of Treatment Failure in Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis. [J].Front Med (Lausanne), 2021, 8:- [13]El Gohary AM, Elyamany AS, Mikhael NL, et al.Serum and ascitic D-dimer in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis[J].Clin Exp Hepatol, 2021, 7(2):134-140 [14]朱旦华, 卢放根.血浆-二聚体在肝硬化并自发性细菌性腹膜炎患者中的临床意义[J].胃肠病学, 2015, 20(01):42-44 [15]Oki R, Tsuji S, Hamasaki Y, et al.Time until treatment initiation is associated with catheter survival in peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis[J].Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1):6547- [16]金蔚, 倪兆慧.保护腹膜功能新认识[J]. [J].中国血液净化, 2019, 18(03):145-148 [17]严月华, 杨春慧, 纪天蓉, 等.探讨腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎不同转归患者的临床特点[J]. [J].中国血液净化, 2020, 19(02):77-80 [18]Ma TK, Chow KM, Kwan BC, et al.Peritonitis before Peritoneal Dialysis Training: Analysis of Causative Organisms,Clinical Outcomes,Risk Factors,and Long-Term Consequences[J].Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016, 11(7):1219-1226 [19]Meng L, Yang L, Zhu X, et al.Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for the Cure of Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis: A Multicenter Observational Study. Front Med (Lausanne), 2022, 9:875154.[J].Front Med (Lausanne), 2022, 9:- [20]许俊, 郑晓丰.超敏反应蛋白检测方法和临床应用进展[J].实验与检验医学, 2011, 29(06):620-622 [21]Zalunardo NY, Rose CL, Ma IW, et al.Higher serum C-reactive protein predicts short and long-term outcomes in peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis[J].Kidney Int, 2007, 71(7):687-692 [22]马莹, 王颖, 王海云, 等.腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎患者短期预后不良危险因素的分析[J].中国医学科学院学报, 2018, 40(01):13-20 [23]黄庆龙, 潘沁, 丁红莲, 等.不同病情缓解速度的腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎患者临床资料比较[J].山东医药, 2021, 61(02):56-58
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]