[an error occurred while processing this directive]
护理研究

维持性血液透析患者运动康复的循证实践

  • 张旋 ,
  • 郭月月 ,
  • 周扣香 ,
  • 陈婷婷 ,
  • 薄祥敏 ,
  • 刘胜凤
展开
  • 210029 南京,1江苏省中医院肾内科

收稿日期: 2022-10-31

  修回日期: 2023-03-14

  网络出版日期: 2023-06-12

基金资助

江苏省名老中医药专家孙伟传承工作室项目(苏中医教科[2019]10号);江苏省中医药管理局科技项目(JD2019SZ06)

Evidence-based practice of exercise rehabilitation in maintenance hemodialysis patients

  • ZHANG Xuan ,
  • GUO Yue-Yue ,
  • ZHOU Kou-Xiang ,
  • CHEN Ting-Ting ,
  • BAO Xiang-Min ,
  • LIU Sheng-Feng
Expand
  • Department of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China

Received date: 2022-10-31

  Revised date: 2023-03-14

  Online published: 2023-06-12

摘要

目的 基于维持性血液透析患者运动康复的证据,实施循证实践,并验证其在改善维持性血液透析患者机体功能、运动耐力和生活质量中的作用。 方法 基于证据的持续质量改善模型为研究框架,于2021年1月~12月通过证据获取、现状审查、证据引入,构建维持性血液透析患者运动康复的循证方案;选取2022年1月~3月在江苏省中医院肾内科住院且维持性血液透析患者80例,随机分为试验组和对照组,各40例,比较运动干预后2组患者肌肉质量、肌肉力量、6分钟步行试验、生活质量指标的差异,同时比较循证实践前后医务人员对运动康复证据的知晓率变化。 结果 最终纳入9条证据,共7条审查指标。运动干预后,试验组较对照组患者肌肉质量提高(t=-3.302,P<0.01)、肌肉力量提升(t=-2.825,P<0.001)、6分钟步行增加(t=-5.529,P<0.001);试验组健康调查简表各维度总分均较对照组提高 (P<0.05);循证实践前后医护人员运动康复证据的知晓率提高40.74%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。 结论 基于证据的运动康复循证实践能够改善维持性血液透析患者机体功能、运动耐力,提高生活质量。

本文引用格式

张旋 , 郭月月 , 周扣香 , 陈婷婷 , 薄祥敏 , 刘胜凤 . 维持性血液透析患者运动康复的循证实践[J]. 中国血液净化, 2023 , 22(06) : 472 -476 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2023.06.016

Abstract

Objective   To implement evidence-based practice based on the evidences from exercise rehabilitation in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, and to validate the role of exercise rehabilitation in improving physical function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in MHD patients.  Methods  The evidence-based continuous quality improvement model was used as the research framework, and an evidence-based program for exercise rehabilitation in MHD patients was conducted from January to December 2021 through evidence acquisition, status review and evidence introduction. A total of 80 MHD patients hospitalized in the Department of Nephrology, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January to March 2022 were then recruited and randomly divided into experimental group (n=40) and control group (n=40). After the exercise intervention, the muscle mass, muscle strength, 6-minute walking test, and quality of life were compared between the two groups. The awareness of sport rehabilitation evidence in medical staff was also compared before and after the evidence-based practice.  Results   Nine pieces of evidences were finally included, with a total of seven reviewed indicators. After exercise intervention, muscle mass (t=-3.302, P<0.01), muscle strength (t=-2.825, P<0.001), and 6-minute walking (t=-5.529, P<0.001) increased more in experimental group than in control group. The total scores of each dimension in the Health Survey Short Form increased more in experimental group than in control group (P<0.05). The awareness rate of sport rehabilitation evidence among medical staff increased by 40.74% before and after evidence-based practice, which has a statistical significance (P<0.001).  Conclusion  The evidence-based exercise rehabilitation practice can improve the body function, exercise endurance and quality of life in MHD patients.

参考文献

[1]Shoji T, Inaba M, Fukagawa M, et al.Effect of Oral Alfacalcidol on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Without Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis: The J-DAVID Randomized Clinical Trial[J].JAMA, 2018, 320(22):2325-2334
[2]Baker LA, March DS, Wilkinson TJ, et al..Clinical practice guideline exercise and lifestyle in chronic kidney disease[J].BMC Nephrol, 2022, (23):75
[3]Hamada M.Yasuda Y.Kato S,st al..The effectiveness and safety of modest exereise in Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease: a single-armed interventional study[J].Clinical & Experimental Nephrology, 2016, 20(2):204-211
[4]Ashby D, Borman N, Burton J, et al.Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on Haemodialysis[J].BMC Nephrol, 2019, 20(1):379
[5]朱政,胡雁,邢唯杰,等.不同类型循证问题的构成[J].护士进修杂志, 2017, 32(21):1991-1994
[6]Farrington, Covic, Adrian, et al.Clinical Practice Guideline on management of older patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b or higher (eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m(2)): a summary document from the European Renal Best Practice Group.[J].Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2016, 31(suppl 2):ii1-ii66
[7]中国医师协会康复医师分会肾康复专业委员会.我国成人慢性肾脏病患者运动康复的专家共识[J].中华肾脏病杂志, 2019, (7):537-543
[8]沈芳,王雯婷,沈梅芬,等.抗阻力运动对维持性血液透析患者运动能力呼吸功能和生活质量影响的Meta分析[J].护士进修杂志,2020,(1):23-28,33
[9]赵萍,黄燕林,何莉,等.脚踏车运动对维持性血液透析患者运动能力和循环状态影响的Meta分析[J].中国全科医学, 2020,(14):1769-1777
[10]Mei Huang,Aili Lv,Jing Wang, et al..Exercise Training and Outcomes in Hemodialysis Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].Am J Nephrol, 2019, (50):240-254
[11]Salhab N , Karavetian M , Kooman J , et al.Effects of intradialytic aerobic exercise on hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Nephrol, 2019, (32):549-566
[12]曲畅,郭海玲,魏宇,等.维持性血液透析后疲乏管理最佳证据总结[J].护理学报, 2021, (05):43-48
[13]周芬,郝玉芳,丛雪,等.指南研究与评价工具AGREE II及各领域分值的补充解释及思考[J].护理学报, 2018, 25(18):56-58
[14]董志娟,张海林.维持性血液透析病人透析期间运动的影响因素和对策研究[J].护理研究, 2019,3(9):1541-1545
[15]BENNETT P N.How a culture of exercise benefits patients on dialysis[J].Journal of Renal Nursing, 2021,2(2):64-69
[16]PU J,JIANG Z,WU W,et al.Efficacy and safety of intradialytic exercise on haemodialysis patients:a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J].BMJ Open, 2019, 9(1):e20633
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]