[an error occurred while processing this directive]
血管通路

药物涂层球囊在血液透析动静脉血管通路的疗效分析

  • 霍桂军 ,
  • 曾宇琪 ,
  • 陶志红 ,
  • 张琴 ,
  • 姚志超 ,
  • 周大勇
展开
  • 215000 苏州,1南京医科大学附属苏州医院/苏州市立医院(本部)血管外科

收稿日期: 2023-12-25

  修回日期: 2024-03-16

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-12

基金资助

苏州市“科教兴卫”青年科技项目(KJXW2021031)

Efficacy of drug-coated balloon in the treatment of venous stenosis in hemodialysis access

  • HUO Gui-Jun ,
  • ZENG Yu-Qi ,
  • TAO Zhi-Hong ,
  • ZHANG Qin ,
  • YAO Zhi-Chao ,
  • ZHOU Da-Yong
Expand
  • Department of Vascular Surgery, Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University / Suzhou Municipal Hospital (Main Campus), Suzhou 215000, China

Received date: 2023-12-25

  Revised date: 2024-03-16

  Online published: 2024-06-12

摘要

目的  评价药物涂层球囊血管成形术(drug-coated balloon angioplasty,DCBA)和普通球囊血管成形术(conventional balloon angioplasty,CBA)治疗动静脉内瘘(arteriovenous fistula,AVF)狭窄的安全性与疗效。 方法  回顾性分析2020年11月─2022年4月在苏州市立医院(本部)收治的152例AVF狭窄的血液透析患者临床资料,根据治疗方式分为药物涂层球囊(drug-coated balloon,DCB)组(n=62)和普通球囊(conventional balloon,CB)组(n=90),采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估2组靶病变再狭窄发生率,并比较手术后6个月的靶病变初级通畅率(target lesion primary patency,TLPP)。 结果  所有患者均取得了技术成功和临床成功并完成随访;Kaplan-Meier生存分析曲线及Log-rank检验结果显示6个月时DCB组初级通畅率优于CB组(OR=1.935,95% CI:1.173~3.193,P=0.017)。 结论  研究结果表明:相较于CBA而言,DCBA可以明显提高血液透析患者AVF的初级通畅率,减少靶病变的再干预,对于AVF狭窄是一种有效安全的治疗方式。

本文引用格式

霍桂军 , 曾宇琪 , 陶志红 , 张琴 , 姚志超 , 周大勇 . 药物涂层球囊在血液透析动静脉血管通路的疗效分析[J]. 中国血液净化, 2024 , 23(06) : 457 -461 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2024.06.013

Abstract

Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) and conventional balloon angioplasty (CBA) in the treatment of venous stenosis in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis access.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 152 hemodialysis patients with AVF stenosis and treated at Suzhou Municipal Hospital from November 2020 to April 2022. Based on the treatment method, they were divided into the drug-coated balloon (DCB) group (n=62) and the conventional balloon (CB) group (n=90). Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess re-stenosis rate of the target lesion in both groups. Primary patency of the target lesion (TLPP) was compared after the operation for 6 months.  Results  All patients achieved technical and clinical success, and completed follow-up observation. There were no statistical differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test indicated that DCBA significantly prolonged the patency of AVF. TLPP after 6 months showed that the DCB group had higher patency rate compared to the CB group (OR=1.935, 95% CI:1.173~3.193, P=0.017).  Conclusion  Our research results indicate that DCBA improves the primary patency rate of AVFs better than CBA in hemodialysis patients, and DCBA also reduces the need for re-intervention of the target lesion. Therefore, DCBA is an effective and safe method for treatment of AVF stenosis.

参考文献

[1] Hill NR, Fatoba ST, Oke JL, et al.Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].PLoS One, 2016,11(7):e0158765. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765
[2] Bittl JACatheter interventions for hemodialysis fistulas and grafts[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2010,3(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.021
[3] Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al.Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States[J].Jama, 2007,298(17):2038-2047. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.17.2038
[4] KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis Adequacy: 2015 update[J].Am J Kidney Dis, 2015,66(5):884-930. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.015.
[5] Beathard GA, Arnold P, Jackson J, et al.Aggressive treatment of early fistula failure[J].Kidney Int, 2003,64(4):1487-1494. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00210.x.
[6] Caplice NM, Wang S, Tracz M, et al.Neoangiogenesis and the presence of progenitor cells in the venous limb of an arteriovenous fistula in the rat[J].Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2007,293(2):F470-475. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00067.2007.
[7] Swedberg SH, Brown BG, Sigley R, et al.Intimal fibromuscular hyperplasia at the venous anastomosis of PTFE grafts in hemodialysis patients. Clinical, immunocytochemical, light and electron microscopic assessment[J].Circulation, 1989,80(6):1726-1736. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.6.1726.
[8] Tigerstedt NM, Savolainen-Peltonen H, Lehti S, et al.Vascular cell kinetics in response to intimal injury ex vivo[J].J Vasc Res, 2010,47(1):35-44. doi: 10.1159/000231719.
[9] Dariushnia SR, Walker TG, Silberzweig JE, et al.Quality Improvement Guidelines for Percutaneous Image-Guided Management of the Thrombosed or Dysfunctional Dialysis Circuit[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016,27(10):1518-1530. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.07.015.
[10] Aruny JE, Lewis CA, Cardella JF, et al.Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous management of the thrombosed or dysfunctional dialysis access. Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Cardiovascular & Interventional Radiology[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol, 1999,10(4):491-498. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(99)70071-0.
[11] Asif A, Lenz O, Merrill D, et al.Percutaneous management of perianastomotic stenosis in arteriovenous fistulae: results of a prospective study[J].Kidney Int, 2006,69(10):1904-1909. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000358.
[12] Pan HB, Liang HL, Lin YH, et al.Metallic stent placement for treating peripheral outflow lesions in native arteriovenous fistula hemodialysis patients after insufficient balloon dilatation[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005,184(2):403-409. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840403.
[13] Vogel PM, Parise CComparison of SMART stent placement for arteriovenous graft salvage versus successful graft PTA[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005,16(12):1619-1626. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000179792.23867.01.
[14] Maya ID, Allon MOutcomes of thrombosed arteriovenous grafts: comparison of stents vs angioplasty[J].Kidney Int, 2006,69(5):934-937. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000214.
[15] Haskal ZJ, Trerotola S, Dolmatch B, et al.Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing dialysis-access grafts[J].N Engl J Med, 2010,362(6):494-503. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902045
[16] Aftab SA, Tay KH, Irani FG, et al.Randomized clinical trial of cutting balloon angioplasty versus high-pressure balloon angioplasty in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula stenoses resistant to conventional balloon angioplasty[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2014,25(2):190-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.10.020
[17] Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B, et al.Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis[J].Circulation, 2009,119(23):2986-2994. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.839282
[18] Clever YP, Cremers B, Krauss B, et al.Paclitaxel and sirolimus differentially affect growth and motility of endothelial progenitor cells and coronary artery smooth muscle cells[J].EuroIntervention, 2011,7 Suppl K(K32-42. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7SKA6
[19] Lai CC, Fang HC, Tseng CJ, et al.Percutaneous angioplasty using a paclitaxel-coated balloon improves target lesion restenosis on inflow lesions of autogenous radiocephalic fistulas: a pilot study[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2014,25(4):535-541. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.014
[20] Kitrou PM, Katsanos K, Spiliopoulos S, et al.Drug-eluting versus plain balloon angioplasty for the treatment of failing dialysis access: final results and cost-effectiveness analysis from a prospective randomized controlled trial (NCT01174472)[J].Eur J Radiol, 2015,84(3):418-423.
[21] Scheller B, Speck U, Schmitt A, et al.Addition of paclitaxel to contrast media prevents restenosis after coronary stent implantation[J].J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003,42(8):1415-1420.
[22] Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, et al.Paclitaxel balloon coating, a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis[J].Circulation, 2004,110(7):810-814.
[23] Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, et al.Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter[J].N Engl J Med, 2006,355(20):2113-2124.
[24] Rittger H, Waliszewski M, Brachmann J, et al.Long-Term Outcomes After Treatment With a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Balloon Angioplasty: Insights From the PEPCAD-DES Study (Treatment of Drug-eluting Stent [DES] In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent Please Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty [PTCA] Catheter)[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2015,8(13):1695-1700.
[25] Tepe G, Zeller T, Albrecht T, et al.Local delivery of paclitaxel to inhibit restenosis during angioplasty of the leg[J].N Engl J Med, 2008,358(7):689-699.
[26] Dhakam S, Jafferani A, Ahmed H, et al.Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting balloons in the treatment of drug-eluting in-stent restenosis: experience of a tertiary care hospital[J].J Invasive Cardiol, 2012,24(7):335-338.
[27] Ng VG, Mena C, Pietras C, et al.Local delivery of paclitaxel in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease[J].Eur J Clin Invest, 2015,45(3):333-345.
[28] Speck U, Scheller B, Hamm BDrug-coated balloons for restenosis prophylaxis[J].Rofo, 2014,186(4):348-358.
[29] Allon MCurrent management of vascular access[J].Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2007,2(4):786-800.
[30] III. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: update 2000[J].Am J Kidney Dis, 2001,37(1 Suppl 1):S137-181.
[31] Tonnessen BH, Money SREmbracing the fistula first national vascular access improvement initiative[J].J Vasc Surg, 2005,42(3):585-586.
[32] Roy-Chaudhury P, Sukhatme VP, Cheung AKHemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: a cellular and molecular viewpoint[J].J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006,17(4):1112-1127.
[33] Somarathna M, Hwang PT, Millican RC, et al.Nitric oxide releasing nanomatrix gel treatment inhibits venous intimal hyperplasia and improves vascular remodeling in a rodent arteriovenous fistula[J].Biomaterials, 2022,280(121254.
[34] Fransson T, Gotts?ter A, Abdulrasak M, et al.Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial[J].J Int Med Res, 2022,50(3):3000605221081662.
[35] Liu C, Wolfers M, Awan BZ, et al.Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Hemodialysis Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials[J].J Am Heart Assoc, 2021,10(23):e022060.
[36] Kocaaslan C, Oztekin A, Bademci MS, et al.A retrospective comparison analysis of results of drug-coated balloon versus plain balloon angioplasty in treatment of juxta-anastomotic de novo stenosis of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas[J].J Vasc Access, 2020,21(5):596-601.

文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]