[an error occurred while processing this directive]
护理研究

维持性血液透析患者社交回避与苦恼现状及影响因素分析

  • 蔡芸 ,
  • 孔凌
展开
  • 210002 南京,1东部战区总医院血液净化中心 国家肾脏疾病临床医学研究中心

收稿日期: 2024-01-15

  修回日期: 2024-04-13

  网络出版日期: 2024-07-12

Analysis of social avoidance and distress in maintenance hemodialysis patients and its influencing factors

  • CAI Yun ,
  • KONG Ling
Expand
  • Center of Blood Purification, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Diseases, General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Nanjing 210002, China

Received date: 2024-01-15

  Revised date: 2024-04-13

  Online published: 2024-07-12

摘要

目的 调查维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis,MHD)患者的社交回避与苦恼现状,并分析其影响因素。 方法 选取2023年9月—12月东部战区总医院血液净化中心行MHD治疗的246例患者为调查对象,采用一般资料问卷、社交回避与苦恼量表、社会影响量表、领悟社会支持量表进行调查。 结果  MHD患者社交回避与苦恼得分为(12.02±6.70)分,处于中等水平。多元线性回归分析发现性别(β=0.278,P<0.001)、家庭人均月收入(β=-0.168,P<0.001)、生活自理能力(β=-0.133,      P=0.005)、并发症数量(β=0.161,P =0.001)、病耻感总分(β=0.344,P<0.001)、领悟社会支持总分(β=-0.257,P<0.001)是社交回避与苦恼的主要影响因素。 结论 MHD患者的社交回避与苦恼处于中等水平,医护人员应结合其相关影响因素为患者提供针对性的干预措施,从而降低患者社交回避与苦恼水平,帮助患者更好地回归社会。

本文引用格式

蔡芸 , 孔凌 . 维持性血液透析患者社交回避与苦恼现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国血液净化, 2024 , 23(07) : 557 -560 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2024.07.015

Abstract

Objective  To investigate the current situation of social avoidance and distress in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients and to analyze its influencing factors.  Method  A total of 246 MHD patients treated in the Blood Purification Center of Eastern Theater Command General Hospital from September 2023 to December 2023 were selected as the investigation subjects. General information questionnaire, social avoidance and distress scale, social impact scale and perceived social support rating scale were used to the investigation.  Results  The score of social avoidance and distress in the MHD patients was 12.02±6.70, which was in the middle level. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses showed that gender (β=0.278, P<0.001), per capita monthly family income (β=-0.168, P<0.001), self-care ability (β=-0.133, P=0.005), number of complications (β=0.161, P=0.001), total score of stigma (β=0.344, P<0.001) and total score of perceived social support (β=-0.257, P<0.001) were the main influencing factors for social avoidance and distress.  Conclusion  The social avoidance and distress in MHD patients are at a moderate level. Medical staff should provide targeted interventions for patients according to the relevant influencing factors, so as to reduce their social avoidance and distress level and help patients better return to society.

参考文献

[1]Coluzzi F. Assessing and treating chronic pain in patients with end-stage renal disease[J]. Drugs,2018,78(14):1459-1479.
[2]凡颖,邢利民,高淑平等.维持性血液透析患者失志综合征现状及影响因素分析[J].中华护理杂志,2023,58(05):572-579.
[3]Grynberg D, López -Pérez B. Facing Others’Misfortune: Personal Distress Mediates the Association between Maladaptive Emotion Regulation and Social Avoidance[ J ]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3):e0194248.
[4]黄明榕,张万群,董超群.艾滋病患者社交回避苦恼、情绪社交孤立与焦虑抑郁的关系[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(14):69-72.
[5]Harvey PD, Deckler E, Jones MT, Jarskog LF, Penn DL, Pinkham AE. Autism symptoms, depression, and active social avoidance in schizophrenia: Association with self-reports and informant assessments of everyday functioning.?J Psychiatr Res. 2019;115:36-42.
[6]王硕,吕利明,张立瑶等.社会关系质量在乳腺癌幸存者病耻感与社交回避及苦恼间的中介效应[J].护理学报,2021,28(15):48-53.
[7]Farina EA, Assaf M, Corbera S, Chen CM. Factors Related to Passive Social Withdrawal and Active Social Avoidance in Schizophrenia.?J Nerv Ment Dis. 2022;210(7):490-496.
[8].Watson D, Friend R. Measurement of Social -evaluative Anxiety[ J ]. J Consult Clin Psychol, 1969, 33(4):448-457.
[9]汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册[M]. 增订版. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999:241-244.
[10]Fife BL, Wright ER. The Dimensionality of Stigma: A Comparison of Its Impact on the Self of Persons with HIV/AIDS and Cancer[ J ]. J Health Soc Behav, 2000, 41(1):50-67.
[11]Pan AW, Chung L, Fife BL, et al. Evaluation of the Psychometrics of the Social Impact Scale: A Measure of Stigmatization[ J ]. Int J Rehabil Res, 2007, 30(3):235-238.
[12]Zimet GD,Powell SS, Farley GK, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support [J]. J Pers Assess,1990,55(3-4):610-617.
[13]姜乾金.领悟社会支持量表 [ J ].中国行为医学科学 ,2001,10(10):41-43.
[14]方雪梅.尿毒症血液透析患者自我隐瞒在家庭关怀度与社交回避及苦恼间的中介效应分析[J].河北医药,2023,45(11):1740-1743.
[15]刘忆冰, 张庆庆, 赵阳, 袁建波, 史园, 丁梅梅, 李萍. 维持性血液透析患者孤独感状况及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37 (18): 94-97.
[16]Zhang N, Lai F, Guo Y, Wang L. Status of and Factors Influencing the Stigma of Chinese Young and Middle-Aged Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Preliminary Study.?Front Psychol. 2022;13:873444. Published 2022 May 11.
[17]关永莲,顾毅,蒋影.老年维持性血液透析病人心理脆弱现状及其与希望水平和社会影响的相关性[J].护理研究,2022,36(22):3977-3981.
[18]崔金锐,徐玉林,曾铁英等.女性终末期肾病患者疾病体验质性研究的Meta整合[J].护理学杂志,2023,38(19):34-39.
[19]Silva ECS, Mantovani MF, Nogueira LA, Küchler ML, Cassi CCAV, Kalinke LP. Financial toxicity in people with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis treatment.?Rev Bras Enferm. 2023;76(4):e20220671. Published 2023 Sep 4.
[20]郑晓,娄小平,杜亚泽等.终末期肾脏病患者生命意义感的现状及影响因素分析[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(20):2502-2506.
[21]Debnath S, Rueda R, Bansal S, Kasinath BS, Sharma K, Lorenzo C. Fatigue characteristics on dialysis and non-dialysis days in patients with chronic kidney failure on maintenance hemodialysis. BMC Nephrol. 2021 Mar 27;22(1):112.
[22]李团结,金鑫,于泽莺等.维持性血液透析患者不安腿综合征的相关危险因素分析[J].中国血液净化,2023,22(04):264-268.
[23]郑雯雯,鲁春红,吕桂兰等.222例维持性血液透析患者的病耻感现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报,2020,27(14):44-48.
[24]何丽芳,李倩倩,甘香.病耻感对中青年维持性血液透析患者心理痛苦的影响[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(21):2585-2591.
[25]张政,安逸群,孙丽娜等.成人依恋在维持性血液透析患者恐惧疾病进展与自我管理间的中介效应分析[J].护理学报,2021,28(12):43-48.
[26]尹艳茹,周洪昌,刘梦如等.老年维持性血液透析患者社会隔离现状的调查研究[J].中华护理杂志,2023,58(07):822-829.
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]