[an error occurred while processing this directive]
临床研究

维持性腹膜透析患者透析龄的预后因素分析

  • 梁如练 ,
  • 吴险峰 ,
  • 汪年松
展开
  • 200030 上海,1上海市第八人民医院肾内科
    200030 上海,2上海市第六人民医院肾内科
    510260 广州,3广州医科大学附属第二医院肾内科

收稿日期: 2024-04-16

  修回日期: 2024-09-12

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-12

Prognostic factors of dialysis age in patients with maintenance peritoneal dialysis

  • LIANG Ru-Lian ,
  • WU Xian-Feng ,
  • WANG Nian-Song
Expand
  • Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Eighth People’s Hospital, Shanghai 200030, China; 2Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai 200030, China; 3Department of Nephrology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China

Received date: 2024-04-16

  Revised date: 2024-09-12

  Online published: 2024-12-12

摘要

目的 分析维持性腹膜透析患者透析龄的预后相关因素。 方法 回顾性分析常青藤肾脏病联盟(evergreen tree nephrology association,ETNA)腹膜透析数据库2005年11月─2020年5月诊治的571例成人维持性腹膜透析患者临床资料,计算生存率、技术生存率,分析影响患者预后因素。腹膜透析(peritoneal dialysis,PD)患者根据透析龄分为长透析龄组(≥60月),短透析龄组(<60月),分析2组患者预后及影响透析龄的危险因素。 结果 571例PD患者1、2、3、5、10年累积生存率为94%、88.8%、80.9%、70.3%、49.8%,累积技术生存率分别为94%、88.8%、80.8%、69.3%、39.2%。多因素COX回归分析显示:慢性阻塞性肺病(chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,COPD)病史(HR=3.339,95% CI:1.054~10.576,P=0.040)、低密度脂蛋白升高(HR=1.222,95% CI:1.032~1.447,P=0.020)、肺部感染(HR=1.568,95% CI:1.252~1.965,P<0.001)是PD患者死亡的独立危险因素。Logistic回归分析显示:吸烟(OR=0.349,95% CI:0.139~0.873,P=0.024)、全段甲状旁腺激素(iPTH)升高(OR=0.999,95% CI:0.998~1.000,P=0.048)、尿量少(OR=1.001,95% CI:1.000~1.001,P<0.001)是影响透析龄的独立危险因素。 结论 吸烟、iPTH升高、尿量少是影响透析龄的独立危险因素,戒烟、合理降低iPTH、保护残余肾功能可延长患者透析时间。

本文引用格式

梁如练 , 吴险峰 , 汪年松 . 维持性腹膜透析患者透析龄的预后因素分析[J]. 中国血液净化, 2024 , 23(12) : 901 -905,919 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2024.12.004

Abstract

Objective  The prognostic factors of dialysis vintage in patients on maintenance peritoneal dialysis were analyzed.  Methods  The clinical data of 571 patients on maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD) in Evergreen Tree Nephrology Association (ETNA) Peritoneal dialysis database from November 2005 to May 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The survival rate and technical survival rate were calculated, and the risk factors influencing prognosis were analyzed. PD patients were divided into long dialysis vintage group (≥60 months) and short dialysis vintage group (<60 months), and the prognosis of the patients in different dialysis vintage groups and the risk factors affecting dialysis vintage were analyzed.  Results  The 1-,2-,3-,5- and 10- year cumulative survival rates of the 571 PD patients were 94%, 88.8%, 80.9%,70.3% and 49.8%. The cumulative technical survival rates were 94%, 88.8%,80.8%,69.3% and 39.2%, respectively. COX Multivariate regression analysis showed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) history (HR=3.39, 95% CI: 1.054~10.576, P=0.040), elevated Low-Density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) (HR=1.222, 95% CI: 1.032~1.447, P=0.020) and pulmonary infection (HR=1.568, 95% CI: 1.252~1.965, P<0.001) were independent risk factors of death in PD patients (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that Smoking (OR=0.349,95% CI: 0.139~0.873,P=0.024), elevated intact parathyroid hormone(iPTH) (OR=0.999, 95% CI: 0.998~1.000, P=0.048)and low urine volume (OR=1.001, 95% CI: 1.000~1.001, P<0.001) were independent risk factors of technical failure.  Conclusion  Smoking, elevated iPTH and low urine volume are independent risk factors of technical failure. Smoking cessation, rational reduction of iPTH and protection of residual renal function can prolong patients' dialysis vintage.

参考文献


[1] Pecoits-Filho R, Okpechi I G, Donner J A, et al. Capturing and monitoring global differences in untreated and treated end-stage kidney disease, kidney replacement therapy modality, and outcomes[J]. Kidney Int Suppl (2011),2020,10(1):e3-e9.
[2] Termorshuizen F, Korevaar J C, Dekker F W, et al. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol,2003,14(11):2851-2860.
[3] Noordzij M, Jager K J. Survival comparisons between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant,2012,27(9):3385-3387.
[4] Zhou L, Wang X, Zhan X, et al. Serum Chloride and Mortality in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: A multi-center retrospective study[J]. EClinicalMedicine,2021,41:101133.
[5] Yu X, Yang X, Huang N. Management of a rapidly growing peritoneal dialysis population at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University[J]. Perit Dial Int,2014,34 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S31-S34.
[6] Liyanage T, Ninomiya T, Jha V, et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review[J]. Lancet,2015,385(9981):1975-1982.
[7] Li P K, Chow K M, Van de Luijtgaarden M W, et al. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol,2017,13(2):90-103.
[8] Li P K, Chow K M, Cho Y, et al. ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment[J]. Perit Dial Int,2022,42(2):110-153.
[9] Bello A K, Okpechi I G, Osman M A, et al. Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis outcomes[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol,2022,18(12):779-793.
[10] Kassa D A, Mekonnen S, Kebede A, et al. Cost of Hemodialysis Treatment and Associated Factors Among End-Stage Renal Disease Patients at the Tertiary Hospitals of Addis Ababa City and Amhara Region, Ethiopia[J]. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res,2020,12:399-409.
[11] Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott K C, et al. US Renal Data System 2019 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States[J]. Am J Kidney Dis,2020,75(1 Suppl 1):A6-A7.
[12] Htay H, Cho Y, Pascoe E M, et al. Predictors of Residual Renal Function Decline in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: The balANZ Trial[J]. Perit Dial Int,2017,37(3):283-289.

文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]