[an error occurred while processing this directive]
护理研究

多扣眼穿刺法对血液透析动静脉内瘘血管内膜增生及穿刺点感染的影响

  • 杨斌姣 ,
  • 沈方 ,
  • 张欢茜
展开
  • 215200 苏州,1苏州市第九人民医院血液净化中心 

收稿日期: 2024-05-11

  修回日期: 2025-01-07

  网络出版日期: 2025-03-12

基金资助

苏州市吴江区“科教兴卫”项目(YK202436)

Effect of multi buttonhole puncture on intimal hyperplasia in arteriovenous fistula and puncture site infection in hemodialysis patients

  • YANG Bin-Jiao ,
  • SHEN Fang ,
  • ZHANG Huan-Qian
Expand
  • Blood Purification Center, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215200, China

Received date: 2024-05-11

  Revised date: 2025-01-07

  Online published: 2025-03-12

摘要

目的 探讨多扣眼穿刺法对血液透析动静脉内瘘(arteriovenous fistula,AVF)血管内膜增生及穿刺点感染的影响。 方法  选取2023年1月─4月在苏州市第九人民医院血液净化中心行规律血液透析患者60例,依据随机数字法分为单扣眼穿刺组(30例)和多扣眼穿刺组(30例)。分别在扣眼穿刺前及扣眼穿刺3个月、6个月、12个月时的非透析日测量患者AVF穿刺区域的血管内膜增生厚度、血流量、动脉阻力指数,并统计扣眼穿刺点感染情况。 结果 穿刺方法使用3个月、6个月、12个月时,多扣眼穿刺组的AVF血管内膜增生厚度均低于单扣眼穿刺组(t=3.246、5.585、6.055,P=0.002、<0.001、<0.001),AVF血流量均高于单扣眼穿刺组(t=2.697、4.551、7.504,P =0.009、<0.001、<0.001),AVF动脉阻力指数低于单扣眼穿刺组(t=3.254、4.779、5.336,P=0.001、<0.001、<0.001)。2组患者的AVF血管内膜增生厚度、动脉阻力指数均随时间变化而增加趋势(F时间=70.030、74.750,均P时间 <0.001),AVF血流量则随时间变化而降低趋势(F时间=42.610,P时间<0.001)。2组的AVF血管内膜增生厚度、血流量及动脉阻力指数的变化均与穿刺时间存在交互效应(F交互 =16.740、6.640、14.070,均P交互<0.001)。多扣眼穿刺组的穿刺点感染发生率低于单扣眼穿刺组(χ2=4.812,P =0.028)。 结论 对AVF使用扣眼穿刺技术时,多扣眼穿刺能减轻血管内膜增生、降低穿刺点感染率。

本文引用格式

杨斌姣 , 沈方 , 张欢茜 . 多扣眼穿刺法对血液透析动静脉内瘘血管内膜增生及穿刺点感染的影响[J]. 中国血液净化, 2025 , 24(03) : 260 -264 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2025.03.020

Abstract

Objective  To investigate the effect of multiple buttonhole puncture on intimal hyperplasia in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and puncture point infection in hemodialysis patients.  Methods  We select 60 patients undergoing regular hemodialysis at the Blood Purification Center of Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital from January to April 2023 as the research subjects. According to the random number method, they were divided into single buttonhole puncture group (30 cases) and multiple buttonhole puncture group (30 cases). The intimal thickness, blood flow and arterial resistance index at AVF puncture area were measured before buttonhole puncture and on non-dialysis day at 3, 6 and 12 months after buttonhole puncture. Infection at the buttonhole puncture site was also observed.  Results  In the multi buttonhole puncture group after using this puncture method for 3, 6 and 12 months, the intimal thickness in AVF was lower (t=3.246, 5.585 and 6.055 respectively; P=0.002,<0.001 and <0.001 respectively), natural blood flow in AVF was higher (t=2.697, 4.551 and 7.504 respectively; P=0.009,<0.001 and <0.001 respectively), and arterial resistance index of AVF was lower (t=3.254, 4.779 and 5.336 respectively; P=0.001,<0.001 and <0.001 respectively), as compared with those in the single buttonhole puncture group. Intimal thickness in AVF and arterial resistance index increased over time (Ftime=70.030 and 74.750, Ptime <0.001), while natural blood flow in AVF decreased over time (Ftime=42.610, Ptime<0.001) in both groups. The changes of intimal thickness in AVF, natural blood flow, and arterial resistance index had an interaction effect with puncture time in both groups (Finteraction=16.740, 6.640 and 14.070 respectively; Pinteraction<0.001). The overall incidence of infection at the puncture site was lower in the multi buttonhole puncture group than in the single buttonhole puncture group (χ2=4.812, P=0.028).  Conclusion  When using the buttonhole puncture technique for blood access from AVF, multiple buttonhole puncture can reduce intimal hyperplasia in AVF and lower the infection rate at the puncture site.

参考文献

[1] Peralta R, Sousa L, Cristov?o AF. Cannulation Technique of Vascular Access in Hemodialysis and the Impact on the Arteriovenous Fistula Survival: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2023,12(18):5946.
[2] Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2020,75(4 Suppl 2):S1-S164.
[3] Ibeas J, Roca-Tey R, Vallespín J, et al. Spanish clin‐ical guidelines on vascular access for haemodialysis[J]. Nefrologia, 2017,37 (Suppl 1):1-191.
[4] van Loon MM, Goovaerts T, Kessels AG, et al. Buttonhole needling of haemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae results in less complications and interventions compared to the rope-ladder technique[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2010, 25(1):225-230.
[5] Hsiao JF, Chou HH, Hsu LA, et al. Vascular changes at the puncture segments of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 52(3):669-673.
[6] Lee T, Ul Haq N. New Developments in Our Understanding of Neointimal Hyperplasia[J]. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis, 2015, 22(6):431-437.
[7] Pisoni RL, Zepel L, Port FK, et al. Trends in US Vascular Access Use, Patient Preferences, and Related Practices: An Update From the US DOPPS Practice Monitor With International Comparisons[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2015,65(6):905-915.
[8] Yang L, Yin A, Liu W. Variation of flow rate and angle of injected venous needle on influencing intimal hyperplasia at the venous anastomosis of the hemodialysis graft[J]. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 2017, 40(1):239-248.
[9] Nassar GM, Rhee E, Khan AJ, et al. Percutaneous thrombectomy of AVF: immediate success and long-term patency rates[J]. Semin Dial, 2015, 28(2):E15-E22.
[10] 张尧,王霄,杜楠楠,等.动静脉内瘘扣眼穿刺处内膜增生特点及停止穿刺的效果观察[J].中国血液净化,2023,22(5):396-400.
[11] Duque JC, Tabbara M, Martinez L, et al. Dialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Failure and Angioplasty: Intimal Hyperplasia and Other Causes of Access Failure[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2017, 69(1):147-151.
[11] Morgans HA, De Souza HG, Richardson T, et al. A comparison of the buttonhole and rope-ladder AVF cannulation techniques and infection rates within the SCOPE collaborative[J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2021, 36(12):3915-3921.
[12] Cunnane CV, Cunnane EM, Walsh MT. A Review of the Hemodynamic Factors Believed to Contribute to Vascular Access Dysfunction[J]. Cardiovasc Eng Technol, 2017, 8(3):280-294.
[13] Di Nicolò P, Cornacchiari M, Mereghetti M, et al. Buttonhole Cannulation of the AV Fistula: A Critical Analysis of the Technique[J]. Semin Dial, 2017, 30(1):32-38.
[14] 于莉,门海燕,赵微微,等.扣眼穿刺在自体动静脉内瘘的应用研究进展[J].中国血液净化,2018,17(7):481-483.
[15] He Y, Shiu YT, Imrey PB, et al. Association of Shear Stress with Subsequent Lumen Remodeling in Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistulas[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2023, 18(1):72-83.
[16] 缪鹏亮,朱唯一. 钝针扣眼穿刺技术在血液净化应用中的并发症及其影响因素[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2020,37(1):77-79.
[17] 王培莉,施素华,林巧红,等. 扣眼穿刺法与绳梯穿刺法对动静脉内瘘功能影响的Meta分析[J]. 中国血液净化,2020,19 (1): 65-69.
[18] 赵秀明,牛洪艳,刘金凤,等.血液透析行扣眼穿刺患者动静脉内瘘发生内膜增生的影响因素分析[J].中国血液净化,2023,22 (9): 710-714.
[19] Qin HY, Jia P, Liu H. Nursing Strategies for Patients with Chronic Renal Failure Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis Treatment by Arteriovenous Fistula[J]. Iran J Public Health, 2016, 45(10):1270-1275.
[20] Yao Y, Mao H, Du Z, et al. Effect of two different techniques of arteriovenous fistula puncture on wound infection in haemodialysis patients[J]. Int Wound J, 2024, 21(3):e14659.
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]