[an error occurred while processing this directive]
护理研究

维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型的系统评价

  • 肖宇 ,
  • 胡婉月 ,
  • 邢心悦 ,
  • 王晨琪 ,
  • 吴亚轩 ,
  • 肖洪玲
展开
  • 301617 天津,1天津中医药大学研究生院
    310053 杭州,2浙江中医药大学护理学院

收稿日期: 2024-09-30

  修回日期: 2025-01-26

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-12

Systematic review of frailty risk prediction models for maintenance hemodialysis patients

  • XIAO Yu ,
  • HU Wan-Yue ,
  • XING Xin-Yue ,
  • WANG Chen-Qi ,
  • WU Ya-Xuan ,
  • XIAO Hong-Ling
Expand
  • Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China; 2School of Nursing, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou 310053, China

Received date: 2024-09-30

  Revised date: 2025-01-26

  Online published: 2025-05-12

摘要

目的 系统评价维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型。 方法 系统检索PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网和SinoMed等数据库,检索时间从建库至2024年8月29日。由2名研究者筛选文献和提取数据,并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险和适用性。 结果 共纳入12篇文献,涉及16个风险预测模型,11个模型进行了验证,9个模型进行了校准,候选变量为7~24个,13个模型报告了建模时AUC(0.66~0.998),4个模型报告了内部验证时AUC(0.828~0.939),2个模型报告了外部验证时AUC(0.865~0.904);预测因子4~10个,年龄、合并症指数、性别和抑郁是出现频率最多的共同预测因子。模型多以列线图的形式呈现。12项研究均为高偏倚风险,11项研究在研究对象、预测因子、结局和总体显示出较好的适用性。 结论 维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型具有较好的预测性能和临床价值,但其偏倚风险较高,模型的外推性存在一定限制。

本文引用格式

肖宇 , 胡婉月 , 邢心悦 , 王晨琪 , 吴亚轩 , 肖洪玲 . 维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 中国血液净化, 2025 , 24(05) : 431 -436 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2025.05.015

Abstract

Objective To systematically evaluate the frailty risk prediction model for maintenance hemodialysis patient.  Methods  PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed were systematically searched with a timeframe from establishment of the database to August 29, 2024. Two investigators screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated bias risk and suitability of the included studies.  Results  Twelve literatures were included, including 16 risk prediction models. Eleven models were validated, and 9 models were calibrated. There were 7~24 candidate variables. Thirteen models reported the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66~0.998 at the establishment of the models; 4 models reported the AUC of 0.828~0.939 by internal validation, and 2 models reported the AUC of 0.865~0.904 by external validation. There were 4~10 predictors; age, charlson comorbidity index (CCI), gender applicability and depression were the common predictors with the highest frequency. Twelve studies had high risks of bias. Eleven studies showed better applicability to study population, predictors, outcomes and overall subjects.  Conclusions  The frailty risk prediction models for maintenance hemodialysis patients have better predictive performance and clinical value. However, these predictive models have higher bias, limiting their extrapolation. A variety of machine learning algorithms can be used for modeling in the future. We should pay attention to the predictors with higher frequencies in the model and carry out external validation of multiple regions, multiple centers, and large samples for these predictors, to develop predictive models with better prediction performance, more clinical utility, and higher generalized suitability. 

参考文献

[1]梁耀先,赵新菊,韦洮.中国血液透析行业发展调研报告[J].中国血液净化,2024,23(05):321-329.
[2]吴芳,王福诩,周红卫.维持性血液透析患者蛋白质能量消耗临床研究进展[J].中国血液净化,2019,18(02):127-130.
[3]Clegg A,Young J,Iliffe S,et al.Frailty in elderly people[J].Lancet,2013,381(9868):752-762.
[4]Moons KGM,de Groot JAH,Bouwmeester W,et al.Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies:the CHARMS checklist[J].PLoS Med,2014,11(10):e1001744.
[5]Wolff RF,Moons KGM,Riley RD,et al.PROBAST:a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies[J].Ann Intern Med,2019,170(1):51-58.
[6]鲁小丹,卫建华,沈建通,等.预测模型系统评价的制作方法与步骤[J].中国循证医学杂志,2023,23(05):602-609.
[7]Johansen KL,Dalrymple LS,Delgado C,et al.Association between body composition and frailty among prevalent hemodialysis patients:a US Renal Data System special study[J].J Am Nephrol,2014,25(2):381-389.
[8]江山秀.维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型的构建[D].湖州师范学院,2022.
[9]李克佳,肖跃飞,胡军,等.维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型的构建研究[J].中国血液净化,2022,21(04):249-252+263.
[10]陈蝶.维持性血液透析患者衰弱影响因素分析及预测模型构建[D].川北医学院,2023.
[11]杨亮,程润,窦俊凯,等.维持性血液透析病人衰弱发生风险列线图模型的构建[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2023,48(04):538-543.
[12]姜媛.基于Gobbens衰弱整合理论构建维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型[D].大连医科大学,2023.
[13]庄建红,顾丽雅,林萍,等.维持性血液透析患者发生衰弱风险预测模型的构建[J].护理管理杂志,2023,23(12):936-940.
[14]应金萍,蔡根莲,陈玲琳,等.维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型的构建及应用研究[J].中华急危重症护理杂志,2023,4(10):874-881.
[15]Lv W,Liao H,Wang X,et al.A machine learning-based assistant tool for early frailty screening of patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis[J].Int Urol Nephrol,2024,56(1):223-235.
[16]汪丹丹,姚侃斐,祝雪花.3种机器学习算法对维持性血液透析病人衰弱风险预测性能比较[J].护理研究,2024,38(01):8-16.
[17]肖宗清,董翠婷,张杰,等.维持性血液透析患者衰弱风险预测模型的建立与验证[J].临床肾脏病杂志,2024,24(04):265-270.
[18]卿伟,邹兆华,易子涵,等.维持性血液透析病人衰弱及衰弱前期风险预测模型的构建[J].护理研究,2024,38(02):233-239.
[19]Ma H,Bandos AI,Gur D.On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests[J].Biom J,2015,57(2):304-320.
[20]Chan GCK,Kalantar-Zadeh K,Ng JKC,et al. Frailty in Patients on Dialysis[J].Kidney Int,2024,S2538-24(00315):6-10.
[21]关雨欣,王陈.老年维持性血液透析患者衰弱的研究进展[J].临床医学进展,2023,13(12):20531-20535.
[22]Deng MG,Liu F,Liang Y,et al.Association between frailty and depression:A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study[J].Sci Adv,2023,9(38):eadi3902.
[23]陈香萍,张奕,庄一渝,等.PROBAST:诊断或预后多因素预测模型研究偏倚风险的评估工具[J].中国循证医学杂志,2020,20(06):737-744.
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]