Objective To investigate the items and costs of peritoneal dialysis (PD) management and the reimbursement of the expenses by medical insurance in PD patients from different regions in China, in order to reduce the financial burden of the patients and to promote the use of PD through the standard items and prices of PD and the rational rules of reimbursement by medical insurance. Methods A self-designed questionnaire on PD items and medical insurance was used to investigate the PD patients in 137 hospitals that provide PD in 30 provinces and big cities in China. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on the collected data, and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum H test was used to examine the differences among groups. Results The nationwide median rates of reimbursement by medical insurance were 80.0 (70.0, 85.0)%, 85.0 (80.0, 90.0)% and 90.0 (80.0, 90.0)% for residents, urban employees, and retired employees, respectively. The monthly expense of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was significantly lower than that of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) (H=26.717, P<0.0001). The monthly reimbursable amount increased with the monthly total expense of CAPD or APD (H=58.367, P<0.001). The prices of PD varied significantly in different provinces and big cities. The prices of surgical removal of granulation tissue at the outlet, waste bag, removal of polyester cuff in PD tube, and treatment of PD catheter-related tunnel infections had not been set up in 63%, 60%, 50% and 47% provinces and big cities respectively. The commonly used disposable materials necessary for PD safety such as dressing, waste bag and disinfectants could not be reimbursed by medical insurance in 77% provinces and big cities. Conclusions This study analyzed the current administration situations of PD management. We therefore recommend that ①the organization and administration of the basic medical insurance system must be continuously reinforced, and the encouragement mechanisms underlying PD services must be improved; ② the prices of PD items should be properly adjusted to support the passions of the hospitals providing high quality of PD services, and ③ the reimbursable PD items are required to be increased to support the safety and quality of PD services.
CHEN Xiao-Jun
,
LIU Hong
,
ZHAO Xin-Ju
,
WEI Tao
,
ZUO Li
. Investigation and analyses on the peritoneal dialysis fees and the reimbursement from medical insurance in Chinese mainland[J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2023
, 22(05)
: 321
-326
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2023.05.001
[1]李恒,陈江华.提高对终末期肾病肾脏替代一体化治疗的认识[J].现代实用医, 2016, 28(4):421-422
[2]中国医师协会肾脏内科医师分会,国家肾病专业医疗质量管理与控制中心.中国医师协会肾脏内科医师分会对肾脏内科医师在新型冠状病毒感染防控期间医疗工作的指导意见[S/OL][J]., 2020, :-
[3]Marshall M R, Polkinghorne K R, Boudville N, et al.Home Versus Facility Dialysis and Mortality in Australia and New Zealand[J].Am J Kidney Dis, 2021, 78(6):826-836
[4]张叶, 杨莉.美国腹膜透析激励政策的经验及对我国的启示[J].中国卫生政策研究, 2022, 15(4):52-58
[5]Yu A W, Chau K F, Ho Y W, et al.Development of the " peritoneal dialysis first" model in Hong Kong[J].Perit Dial Int, 2007, 27 (Suppl 2):S53-55
[6]董捷,左力.合理选择自动化腹膜透析, 我们准备好了吗? [J].中华肾脏病杂志, 2010, 26(7):493-496
[7]曹字芳, 姒怡冰, 陶珺珺.居家自动化腹膜透析和持续性腹膜透析卫生经济学效益及应用效果比较 [J].护理研究, 2022, 36(6):5-5
[8]中国医师协会肾脏内科医师分会 中, 国家肾病专业医疗质量管理与控制中心.自动化腹膜透析中国专家共识[J].中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(6):388-399
[9]广东省医疗保障局.广东医保实施腹膜透析治疗费用包干政策减轻慢性肾脏病患者负担[EB/OL] [J]., (2021-06-07), :-
[10]尹晓丽,王丽.腹膜透析患者并发感染性腹膜炎的高危因素分析及护理对策[J].中华全科医学, 2014, 12(3):481-483
[11]阳晓,严骏飞,余学清.艾考糊精腹透液的临床优势及获益人群[J].中华肾脏病杂志, 2021, 37(6):528-533
[12]Johnson D W, Vincent K, Blizzard S, et al.Cost savings from peritoneal dialysis therapy time extension using icodextrin [J].Adv Perit Dial, 2003, 19( ):81-85
[13]Boudville N, de Moraes T P.Guidelines on targets for solute and fluid removal in adults being treated with chronic peritoneal dialysis: 2019 Update of the literature and revision of recommendations[J].Perit Dial Int, 2020, 40(3):254-260
[14]Xu X, Ma T, Tian X, et al.Telemedicine and Clinical Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis: A Propensity-Matched Study[J].Am J Nephrol, 2022, 53(8-9):663-674