[an error occurred while processing this directive]

How to assess the microcirculation status of critically ill patients?

  • SUN Xue-Feng
Expand
  • Department of Nephrology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital; State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases; National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Diseases, Beijing 100853, China

Received date: 2024-01-15

  Revised date: 2024-01-22

  Online published: 2024-03-12

Abstract

Accurate assessment of microcirculation status in critically ill patients is of great value in guiding clinical decisions on fluid resuscitation, the use of vasoactive medications, and renal replacement therapy. This article introduces the common methods, effects and precautions for evaluation of microcirculation status in these patients based on evidence-based evidence, aiming to provide guidance to diagnose microcirculation disorders in time and improve treatment levels.

Cite this article

SUN Xue-Feng . How to assess the microcirculation status of critically ill patients?[J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2024 , 23(03) : 161 -164 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2024.03.001

References

1. Londo?o J, Ni?o C, Díaz J, et al. Association of Clinical Hypoperfusion Variables With Lactate Clearance and Hospital Mortality[J]. Shock, 2018, 50(3):286-292.
2. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8):775-787.
3. Marbach JA, Stone S, Schwartz B, et al. Lactate Clearance Is Associated With Improved Survival in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factor Studies[J]. J Card Fail, 2021, 27(10):1082-1089.
4. Ding XF, Yang ZY, Xu ZT, et al. Early goal-directed and lactate-guided therapy in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Transl Med, 2018, 16(1):331.
5. Misango D, Pattnaik R, Baker T, et al. Hemodynamic Assessment and Support in Sepsis and Septic Shock in Resource-Limited Settings[M]. In: Dondorp AM, Dünser MW, Schultz MJ, editors. Sepsis Management in Resource-limited Settings [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2019. Chapter 7. PMID: 32091694 Free Books & Documents.
6. Ait-Oufella H, Bige N, Boelle PY, et al. Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2014, 40(7):958-964.
7. Zampieri FG, Damiani LP, Bakker J, et al. Effects of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels among patients with septic shock: a bayesian reanalysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020, 201:423-429.
8. Hernández G, Castro R and Bakker J. Capillary refill time: the missing link between macrocirculation and microcirculation in septic shock?[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2020, 12(3): 1127-1129.
9. Ait-Oufella H, Lemoinne S, Boelle PY, et al. Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2011, 37(5):801-807.
10. Coudroy R, Jamet A, Frat J, et al. Incidence and impact of skin mottling over the knee and its duration on outcome in critically ill patients[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2015, 41(3):452-459.
11. Dumas G, Lavillegrand JR, Joffre J, et al. Mottling score is a strong predictor of 14-day mortality in septic patients whatever vasopressor doses and other tissue perfusion parameters[J]. Crit Care, 2019, 23(1):211.
12. Akata T, Kanna T, Yoshino J, et al. Reliability of fingertip skin-surface temperature and its related thermal measures as indices of peripheral perfusion in the clinical setting of the operating theatre[J]. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2004, 32(4):519-529.
13. Lima A, Jansen TC, van Bommel J, et al. The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients[J]. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37:934-938.
14. Hernandez G, Pedreros C, Veas E, et al. Evolution of peripheral vs metabolic perfusion parameters during septic shock resuscitation. A clinical-physiologic study[J]. J Crit Care, 2012, 27:283-288.
15. Fleuren LM, Klausch TLT, Zwager CL, et al. Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2020, 46(3):383-400.
16. 刘大为,王小亭,张宏民,等. 重症血流动力学治疗——北京共识[J]. 中华内科杂志,2015,54(3):248-271.
17. Scheeren TWL, Wicke JN, Teboul JL. Understanding the carbon dioxide gaps[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2018, 24(3):181-189.
18. Huh JW, Oh BJ, Lim CM, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between intermittent and continuous monitoring of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a pilot study[J]. Emerg Med J, 2013, 30(11):906-909.
19. Protti A, Masson S, Latini R, et al. Persistence of Central Venous Oxygen Desaturation During Early Sepsis Is Associated With Higher Mortality: A Retrospective Analysis of the ALBIOS Trial[J]. Chest, 2018, 154(6):1291-1300.
20. Al Duhailib Z, Hegazy AF, Lalli R, et al. The Use of Central Venous to Arterial Carbon Dioxide Tension Gap for Outcome Prediction in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Crit Care Med, 2020, 48(12):1855-1861.
21. Futier E, Robin E, Jabaudon M, et al. Central venous O? saturation and venous-to-arterial CO? difference as complementary tools for goal-directed therapy during high-risk surgery[J]. Crit Care, 2010, 14(5):R193.
22. H N LK, Tripathy S, Das PK. Central Venous-to-Arterial CO2 Difference-Assisted Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Management During Major Surgery-A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Anesth Analg, 2022, 134(5):1010-1020.
23. Du W, Liu D, Wang X, et al. Combining central venous-to-arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide difference and central venous oxygen saturation to guide resuscitation in septic shock[J]. J Crit Care, 2013, 28(6):1110.e1-5.
Outlines

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]