Objective A cross-sectional analysis of vascular access for hemodialysis in a large hemodialysis center in Tibet. Methods Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) in the Blood Purification Center, the People's Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region from December 2021 to December 2022 were recruited for the analysis. Demographic characteristics, primary disease, dialysis vintage, the first and current vascular access modality were collected. Results A total of 194 MHD patients were included in the analysis. Vascular access used temporary central venous catheter, tunnel-cuffed catheter (TCC), arteriovenous graft (AVG) and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for the first dialysis access were found in 66(34.0%), 88(45.4%), 2(1.0%), and 38(19.6%) patients, respectively. Forty-seven patients (24.2%) completed the AVF construction surgery before dialysis. In the patients with AVF surgery before dialysis, there were more male patients (83% vs. 68%, χ²=3.919, P=0.048), more patients with a college education or above (53.2% vs. 21.1%, χ²=17.875, P<0.001), and more patients using AVF or AVG as the vascular access (97.9% vs. 86.4%, χ²=4.860, P=0.029), as compared with those without AVF surgery before dialysis. AVF, AVG and TCC were used as the vascular access for MHD in 86.6%, 2.6% and 10.8%, respectively, of all MHD patients. Compared with the patients using non-TCC access, TCC as the vascular access was usually found in patients with older age (58.3±15.0 vs. 51.7±13.8, t=2.039, P=0.043) and less likely to have glomerulonephritis as the cause of renal failure (23.8% vs. 47.4%, χ²=4.213, P=0.040). Patients with temporary central venous catheter as the initial vascular access (n=66) were more likely to use TCC for MHD (19.7% vs. 6.3%, χ²=8.157, P=0.007), as compared with the patients using other vascular access (n=128). Conclusion AVF as the vascular access for MHD in this center was 86.6%, compliant with the requirement of the guidelines. However, the use of TCC was 10.8%, slightly higher than the requirement of the guidelines. Improvement of technology and pre-dialysis education are warranted to reduce the use of TCC for MHD.
SUO Lang-QuZhen
,
LI Guo-Liang
,
A Yong
,
CUI Zhuan
,
TANG Wen
. A cross-sectional analysis of vascular access in maintenance hemodialysis patients in a large single center in Tibet[J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2024
, 23(06)
: 453
-456
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2024.06.012
[1]李剑莹,郝丽.维持性血液透析血管通路临床应用现状[J].中国血液净化, 2014, 13(8):585-588
[2]徐丽华,余姝,吴其顺,等.终末期肾病患者首次血液透析血管通路情况的分析[J].中国血液净化, 2022, 21(11):840-843
[3]金其庄,王玉柱,叶朝阳,等.中国血液透析用血管通路专家共识第版[J].中国血液净化, 2019, 18(6):365-381
[4]Lok C E, Huber T S, Lee T, et al.KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update[J].American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2020, 75(4 Suppl 2):S1-S164
[5]曾海鸥, 罗敏虹, 袁丽萍, 等.老年血液透析患者不同类型血管通路并发症对比[J]., 2014(5) : 47-48.[J].现代妇女(医学前沿), 2014, 5(5):47-48
[6]刘佳丽, 张和平, 王鲸竹, 等.四川省东北部地区血液透析患者血管通路的调查分析[J].中国血管外科杂志电子版, 2023, 15(2):145-148
[7]Pisoni R L, Zepel L, Port F K, et al.Trends in US Vascular Access Use,Patient Preferences,and Related Practices: An Update From the US DOPPS Practice Monitor With International Comparisons[J].American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2015, 65(6):905-915
[8]冯珍珍, 赵慧杰, 寇洁, 等.血液透析患者参与血管通路共享决策类型及影响因素研究[J].中国血液净化, 2022, 21(1):66-70