[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Construction of a risk prediction model for abdominal aortic calcification in maintenance hemodialysis patients

  • SHAO Feng ,
  • LI Zhong-Xin ,
  • WANG Xiao-Qi ,
  • YUAN Dan ,
  • LIU Cong-Hui ,
  • XIAOYING -Lian
Expand
  • Department of Nephrology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China

Received date: 2024-06-11

  Revised date: 2024-09-18

  Online published: 2025-01-12

Supported by

The correlation between biomarkers and cognitive function and vascular calcification in dialysis patients and their impact on prognosis

Abstract

Objective To study the correlation between the values of plasma atherosclerotic index (AIP) and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) and the presence of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, from which a risk prediction model of AAC was then constructed.  Methods  This was a cross-sectional study. Clinical data of the MHD patients treated in our hospital from May 1, 2023 to April 30, 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to determine the risk factors for ACC, from which a column chart was constructed and internally validated.  Results A total of 158 MHD patients were enrolled in this study. They were divided into AAC group (n=106) and non-AAC group (n=52). Age (F=1.325, P<0.001), corrected serum calcium (F=0.343, P=0.016), AIP (F=8.726, P=0.003) and rate of diabetes history (F=9.287, P=0.002) were higher in AAC group than in non-AAC group; dialysis age (F=3.681, P=0.007), blood albumin (F=3.287, P=0.002), blood phosphorus (F=0.344, P=0.018), and LMR (F=1.824, P=0.022) were lower in AAC group than in non-AAC group. Multivariate logistic regression found that older age (OR=1.071, 95% CI: 1.034~1.108, P<0.001), diabetes (OR=3.346, 95% CI: 1.428~7.843, P=0.005), high AIP (OR=1.176, 95% CI: 1.041~1.33, P=0.009) and low LMR (OR=0.777, 95% CI: 0.614~0.983, P=0.036) were the independent risk factors for AAC in MHD patients. A column chart was then constructed and the C-index of 0.834 (95% CI: 0.769~0.899) was calculated, indicating a better discriminative ability of the column chart model. A calibration curve was drawn, and the absolute error between simulated curve and actual curve was 0.029, indicating a strong consistency of the model.  Conclusions  Older age, diabetes, higher AIP and lower LMR are the independent risk factors for AAC in MHD patients. The risk prediction model based on age, diabetes, AIP and LMR has a better prediction efficiency.

Cite this article

SHAO Feng , LI Zhong-Xin , WANG Xiao-Qi , YUAN Dan , LIU Cong-Hui , XIAOYING -Lian . Construction of a risk prediction model for abdominal aortic calcification in maintenance hemodialysis patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2025 , 24(01) : 27 -30,53 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2025.01.005

References

[1]Seiler-Mussler S, Limbach A S, Emrich I E, et al.Association of Nonoxidized Parathyroid Hormone with Cardiovascular and Kidney Disease Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease[J].Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology: CJASN, 2018, 13(4):569-576
[2] Zhan Y, Xu T, Tan X.Two parameters reflect lipid-driven inflammatory state in acute coronary syndrome: atherogenic index of plasma, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio[J].BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2016, 16(96):1-6
[3]徐维琳,周树,唐金海,等.淋巴细胞单核细胞比值在乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效评估中的预测价值研究[J].中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2023, 15(1):1-6
[4]Morabia A, Abel T.The WHO report "Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment" and us[J].Soz Praventivmed, 2006, 51(2):74-74
[5]M M, D T, E S.Vascular calcification: the killer of patients with chronic kidney disease[J].Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN, 2009, 20(7):1453-1464
[6]Falk E, Nakano M, Bentzon J F, et al.Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists' view[J].Eur Heart J, 2013, 34(10):719-728
[7]Hammam N, Abdel-Wahab N, Gheita T A.Atherogenic Index of Plasma in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A 10-Year Potential Predictor of Cardiovascular Disease[J].Curr Rheumatol Rev, 2021, 17(1):122-130
[8]Wu T T, Gao Y, Zheng Y Y, et al.Atherogenic index of plasma (AIP): a novel predictive indicator for the coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women[J].Lipids Health Dis, 2018, 17(1):197-203
[9] Yildiz G, Duman A, Aydin H, et al.Evaluation of association between atherogenic index of plasma and intima-media thickness of the carotid artery for subclinic atherosclerosis in patients on maintenance hemodialysis[J][J].Hemodialysis international, 2013, 17(3):397-405
[10]Tang Y, Purkayastha S, Cai D.Hypothalamic microinflammation: a common basis of metabolic syndrome and aging[J].Trends Neurosci, 2015, 38(1):36-44
[11]O H B, Bosch J A, Thomas G N, et al.Which leukocyte subsets predict cardiovascular mortality? From the LUdwigshafen RIsk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) Study[J].Atherosclerosis, 2012, 224(1):161-169
[12]Sasmita B R, Zhu Y, Gan H, et al.Prognostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A cohort study[J].Int J Clin Pract, 2021, 75(10):1-10
[13]Zhao Y, Hao C, Bo X, et al.The prognostic value of admission lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2022, 22(1):308-317
[14] Tudurachi B S, Anghel L, Tudurachi A, et al.Assessment of Inflammatory Hematological Ratios (NLR, PLR, MLR, LMR and Monocyte/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio) in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Particularities in Young Patients[J]. [J].Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(18):1-17
[15] 高亚洲.血细胞比值与维持性血液透析患者血管钙化的相关性研究[D] .桂林医学院, 2021, :-
Outlines

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]