[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Construction and verification of hemodialysis-related headache prediction model base on Logistic-Nomogram

  • ZOU Han
Expand
  • Department of Nephrology, 2Department of Special Internal Medicine, 3Department of Neurology, and 4Department of Pain, Lanzhou University Second Hospital (Second Clinical School), Lanzhou 730000, China

Received date: 2024-12-05

  Revised date: 2025-02-08

  Online published: 2025-06-12

Abstract

Objective  To investigate risk factors for hemodialysis-related headache (HRH) and develop and validate a predictive model using logistic-nomogram analysis. Methods  Clinical data of hemodialysis patients at the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from March 2021 to March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients treated from March 2021 to May 2023 were assigned to the training set (n=229), and those from June 2023 to March 2024 were included in the validation set (n=98). The influencing factors of HRH were analyzed by Logistic regression models. A nomogram model was constructed using the rms package in R, with calibration evaluated via the calibrate function. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves assessed the model’s predictive performance. Results  There was no significant difference in clinical data between the training set and the validation set (P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that elevated pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure (SBP, OR =1.124, 95% CI: 1.051~1.203, P=0.001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP, OR=1.128, 95% CI: 1.066~1.194, P=0.001), and serum sodium (OR=1.119, 95% CI:1.076~1.338, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for HRH in hemodialysis patients, while higher platelet count (PLT) was a protective factor for HRH (OR=0.932, 95% CI:0.895~0.971, P=0.001). The prediction model of HRH risk in hemodialysis patients was constructed with SBP, DBP, serum sodium and PLT as variables. The nomogram model demonstrated strong predictive performance, Dxy=0.831, C-index=0.916, mean absolute error (MAE) =0.017 in the training set, and Dxy=0.804, C-index=0.902, MAE=0.029 in the validation set. Calibration curves closely aligned with ideal curves in both sets.  ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) =0.916 (95% CI: 0.872~0.948), Youden index=0.720, sensitivity=81.13%, specificity=90.91% in the training set, and AUC=0.903 (95% CI: 0.826~0.954), Youden index=0.756, sensitivity=92%, specificity= 83.56% in the validation set.  Conclusion  Elevated pre-dialysis SBP, DBP, and serum sodium are independent risk factors for HRH, while higher PLT is protective. The nomogram model based on these variables provides robust predictive value for HRH risk in hemodialysis patients.

Cite this article

ZOU Han . Construction and verification of hemodialysis-related headache prediction model base on Logistic-Nomogram[J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2025 , 24(06) : 474 -478 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2025.06.007

References

[1]Hazim A, Adarmouch L, Eloury A, et al. Hemodialysis-related headache: Still a challenge in 2020? Effect of conventional versus online hemodiafiltration from a study in Casablanca, Morocco[J]. Artif Organs, 2021, 45(6):602-607.
[2]Chirchiglia D, Andreucci M, Della Torre A, et al. New-onset hemodialysis-related headache presenting as migraine aura[J]. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 2017, 51(5):419-420.
[3]Gozubatik-Celik G, Uluduz D, Goksan B, et al. Hemodialysis-related headache and how to prevent it[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2019, 26(1):100-105.
[4]Aoun MH, Hilal N, Beaini C, et al. Effects of Caffeinated and Decaffeinated Coffee on Hemodialysis-Related Headache (CoffeeHD): A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial[J]. J Ren Nutr, 2021, 31(6):648-660.
[5]Gan Q, Zhang L, Fang Y, et al. Low pulse pressure and high serum complement C1q are risk factors for hemodialysis headache: A case-control study[J]. Headache, 2024, 64(3):285-298.
[6]Chhaya KT, Mankad S, Shah MK, et al. Headache Associated with Hemodialysis in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease in India: A Common Yet Overlooked Comorbidity[J]. Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 2022, 25(1):82-87.
[7]Gürsoy G, Karada? S, K?se ?, et al. The role of calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P in the pathogenesis of dialysis headache[J]. Hemodial Int, 2024, 28(1):85-91.
[8]Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version)[J]. Cephalalgia, 2013, 33(9):629-808.
[9]张彤, 齐晶晶, 满玉红, 等. 透析性头痛研究进展[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2015, 17(20):5983-5985.
[10]Peres MFP. Dialysis headache[J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2022, 80(2):111.
[11]徐中山. 高血压与交感神经系统的神经源性机制研究进展[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2015, 13(13):1505-1508.
[12]Xiong Y, You N, Qin S, et al. The role of hemodialysis access in intradialysis and interdialysis vital sign variabilities and the development of dialysis headache[J]. Ren Fail, 2024, 46(2):2411367.
[13]Xiong Y, You N, Liao R, et al. Association of intradialysis blood sodium level, blood pressure variability, and hydration status with hemodialysis-related headache: a prospective cohort study[J]. J Headache Pain, 2023, 24(1):166.
[14]Ge W, Gao L, Zhang Y, et al. Association Between Serum Lipid Levels and Severe Headache or Migraine in Representative American Population: A Cross-sectional Study[J]. Curr Neurovasc Res, 2021, 18(3):333-342.
[15]Sousa Melo E, Carrilho Aguiar F, Sampaio Rocha-Filho PA. Dialysis Headache: A Narrative Review[J]. Headache, 2017, 57(1):161-164.
[16]杨怡尧. 苏州地区透析性头痛临床特征及影响因素分析[D]. 江苏:苏州大学, 2019.
[17]吴宇璐, 乔建林, 徐开林, 等. 血小板在组织修复中作用的研究进展[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志, 2016, 24(5):1603-1606.
[18]黄继刚, 卢旭, 张雪, 等. 凝血酶调节蛋白、纤溶酶原激活剂抑制物-1与儿童免疫性血小板减少症的相关性[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2021, 27(1):90-91.
[19]甘泉, 石明, 方玉婷, 等. 血小板参数与血液透析相关性头痛[J]. 卒中与神经疾病, 2024, 31(1):58-62.
Options
Outlines

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]