Objectives This study aimed to investigate the effects of online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) dilution methods and substitution fluid volume on dialysis quality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Method A total of 81 patients with MHD were divided into three groups: group A (predilution, substitution volume 18L), group B (predilution, substitution volume 36L) and group C (postdilution, substitution volume 18L). The solute clearance rates, cardiovascular benefits, quality of life, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared among the three groups after 12 months of treatment. Results After treatment, the levels of serum phosphorus (P), serum creatinine (Scr) and cystatin C(Cyst-C) in group B were higher than those in groups A and C (B vs. A：t=-2.056、-4.224、-0.349，P=0.045、＜0.001、0.029；B vs. C：t=3.070、4.633、4.110，P=0.003、＜0.001、＜0.001), while the urea clearance index (Kt/V) was lower than that of groups A and C (Kt/V >1.2; B vs. C:t=-4.932，P＜0.001; A vs. B:t=2.213，P=0.031). Group B had significantly lower levels of β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), and C-reactive protein (CRP) than Group A (t=0.775, -2.205, 3.145; P=0.042, 0.032, 0.003). Group B had significantly lower carotid intima-media thickness and left ventricular mass index levels than Groups A and C (A vs. B: t=3.116, 2.934; P=0.003, 0.005; B vs. C: t=-2.126, -0.243; P=0.038, 0.009). Its left ventricular ejection fraction (B vs. C: t=3.429, P=0.001; B vs. A: t=-5.107, P＜0.001) and quality of life scores (B vs. A: t=-3.494, P=0.001; B vs. C: t=2.988, P=0.004) were significantly higher than Groups A and C. The incidence of adverse reactions in Group B was significantly lower than in Group A (t=0.448, P=0.006) and Group C (t=0.687, P=0.009). Conclusion The predilution mode with double the substitution fluid volume (36L) can, while ensuring dialysis adequacy, reduce hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality rates, improve quality of life, and demonstrate a higher safety profile.
YANG Ying
,
TANG Jian-Ying
,
MOU Jiao
. Comparative analysis of the therapeutic effects of different dilution methods and substitution fluid volumes in online hemodiafiltration[J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2025
, 24(07)
: 576
-580
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2025.07.007
[1]Locatelli F, Karaboyas A, Pisoni RL, et al. Mortality risk in patients on hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: a 'real-world' comparison from the DOPPS. NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL. 2018; 33 (4): 683-689.
[2]凌惠宁,章海芬,刘倩,等.在线血液透析滤过患者置换液剂量影响因素分析[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2020,26(21):47-50.
[3]中国医院协会血液净化中心分会和中关村肾病血液净化创新联盟“血液净化模式选择工作组”,左力.血液净化模式选择专家共识[J].中国血液净化, 2019, 18(7):31.
[4]中国医师协会肾脏病医师分会血液透析充分性协作组.中国血液透析充分性临床实践指南[J].中华医学杂志 2015年95卷34期, 2748-2753页, MEDLINE ISTIC PKU CSCD CA, 2015.
[5]Belmouaz M, Goussard G, Joly F, et al. Comparison of High-Flux, Super High-Flux, Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration on the Removal of Uremic Toxins. BLOOD PURIFICAT. 2022; 52 (3): 309-318.
[6]Sánchez-Ospina D, Mas-Fontao S, Gracia-Iguacel C, et al. Displacing the Burden: A Review of Protein-Bound Uremic Toxin Clearance Strategies in Chronic Kidney Disease. J Clin Med. 2024; 13 (5).
[7]Ma S, Pu N, Ma J. Effects of high-flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration on the mortality of patients with end-stage kidney disease: a meta-analysis. RENAL FAILURE. 2023; 45 (1): 2147436.
[8]?stergaard HB, Westerink J, Verhaar MC, et al. End-stage kidney disease in patients with clinically manifest vascular disease; incidence and risk factors: results from the UCC-SMART cohort study. J NEPHROL. 2021; 34 (5): 1511-1520.
[9]Lee HS, Lim HI, Moon TJ, et al. Trajectories of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk scores as a predictor for incident chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2024; 25 (1): 141.
[10]Burlacu A, Genovesi S, Basile C, et al. Coronary artery disease in dialysis patients: evidence synthesis, controversies and proposed management strategies. J NEPHROL. 2020; 34 (1): 39-51.
[11]Hirsch D, Lau B, Kushwaha V, et al. The Controversies of Coronary Artery Disease in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients: A Narrative Review. REV CARDIOVASC MED. 2023; 24 (6): 181.
[12]Zoccali C, Benedetto F A, Mallamaci F, et al. Left ventricular mass monitoring in the follow-up of dialysis patients: Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy progression[J]. Kidney International, 2004, 65(4):1492-1498.
[13]Beddhu, S, Boucher, RE, Sun, J, et al. Chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic plaque characteristics on carotid magnetic resonance imaging, and cardiovascular outcomes. BMC Nephrol. 2021; 22 (1): 69.
[14]Blankestijn P J, Grooteman M P, Nube M J, et al. Clinical evidence on haemodiafiltration[J]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2018, 33(Suppl 3):53-58.
[15]Davenport A, Cox C, Thuraisingham R. Achieving blood pressure targets during dialysis improves control but increases intradialytic hypotension[J]. Kidney International, 2008, 73(6):759-764.
[16]Alostaz, M, Correa, S, Lundy, GS, et al. Time of hemodialysis and risk of intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic hypertension in maintenance hemodialysis. J HUM HYPERTENS. 2023; 37 (10): 880-890.
[17]Canty JM Jr, Fallavollita JA. Chronic hibernation and chronic stunning: a continuum[J]. J Nucl Cardiol. 2000, 7(5):509-527.
[18]Lavainne F, Meffray E, Pepper RJ, et al. Heparin use during dialysis sessions induces an increase in the antiangiogenic factor soluble Flt1[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014, 29(6):1225-31.
[19]Marco G, Reuter S, Hillebrand U, et al. The soluble VEGF receptor sFlt1 contributes to endothelial dysfunction in CKD.[J]. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009, 20(10):2235-2245.
[20]Hung-Ping Chen, Chang-Hsu Chen, and Paik-Seong Lim. "Comparative Study of the Efficacy of High Volume Predilution Online Hemodiafiltration and High Volume Postdilution Online Hemodiafiltration"[J]. Acta Nephrologica, 2020,34(2):69-79.
[21]张臻,丁小强.血液透析滤过的临床应用进展[J].中国血液净化,2020,19(12):843-846.
