炼化企业安全绿色高质量发展指标评价体系信度研究

炼油技术与工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 60-.

• 计算机应用 • 上一篇

炼化企业安全绿色高质量发展指标评价体系信度研究

陈嘉怡, 张芷筠, 苑丹丹, 刘畅, 麻雪桐, 刘洋

中国石化工程建设有限公司

收稿日期:2022-08-17 出版日期:2023-01-15 发布日期:2023-01-31
作者简介:陈嘉怡，高级工程师，硕士，长期从事企业数字化、数据分析等工作。联系电话：010-84877931,E-mail:i_blues@163.com。
基金资助:
中国石油化工股份有限公司能源管理与环境保护部课题(RD-21-R004);

Reliability study on the safe, eco-friendly and high-quality development evaluation indicator system of refinery enterprise

Chen Jiayi, Zhang Zhiyun, Yuan Dandan, Liu Chang, Ma Xuetong, Liu Yang

SINOPEC Engineering Incorporation

Received:2022-08-17 Online:2023-01-15 Published:2023-01-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当前对于与工业高质量发展指标体系配套的统计测度分析的发展还相对滞后，上级管理部门难以对指标的合理性及企业指标数据的一致性做出准确的衡量，无法及时对指标体系做出评判和调整，影响了指标的可用性和有效性。基于中国石化安全绿色高质量发展炼化企业指标评价体系，对企业指标数据进行了克伦巴赫系数(Cronbach’s α)计算、层次聚类、变异系数测试，取得了初步成果，依据分析结果对其中部分指标项提出了调整建议。数据基于市场竞争力、资源可持续能力、绿色低碳能力、本质安全能力、科技创新能力、社会影响力等6大指标项、40个分项，其中市场竞争力、资源可持续能力、社会影响力通过了信度测试；绿色低碳能力、科技创新能力在数据进一步标准化后已通过；本质安全能力数据未通过信度测试。

关键词: 炼化企业, 指标评价体系, 信度分析, Cronbach’s α, 变异系数, 反应性指标, 形成性指标, 多重共线性

Abstract:

At present, the development of statistical measurement and analysis supporting the industrial high-quality development indicator system is relatively lagging behind. It is difficult for the management department to accurately measure the rationality of indicators and the consistency of enterprise indicator data, and unable to timely evaluate and adjust the indicator system, which affects the availability and effectiveness of indicators. Based on SINOPEC's safe, eco-friendly, and high-quality development evaluation indicator system of refinery enterprise, we conducted Cronbach's α calculation, hierarchical clustering and coefficient of variation test on enterprise indicator data, and achieved preliminary results. Based on the analysis results, we proposed several adjustments to some indicators. The data is based on market competitiveness, resource and energy sustainability, eco-friendly low-carbon ability, inherent safety ability, technology innovation ability, and social influence, with a total of 6 major items and 40 sub items. Among them, market competitiveness, resource sustainability and social influence passed the reliability test; the eco-friendly low-carbon ability and technology innovation ability passed the reliability test after further standardization of data; the inherent safety ability failed the reliability test.

Key words: refinery enterprise, evaluation indicator system, reliability analysis, Cronbach's α, coefficient of variation, reactivity indicator, formative indicator, multicollinearity

陈嘉怡, 张芷筠, 苑丹丹, 刘畅, 麻雪桐, 刘洋 . 炼化企业安全绿色高质量发展指标评价体系信度研究[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2023, 53(1): 60-.

Chen Jiayi, Zhang Zhiyun, Yuan Dandan, Liu Chang, Ma Xuetong, Liu Yang . Reliability study on the safe, eco-friendly and high-quality development evaluation indicator system of refinery enterprise[J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2023, 53(1): 60-.

参考文献

[1] 齐二石，王慧明.制造业信息化评价指标体系和方法研究[J].工业工程，2005(2):52-56.

[2] 张志颖，张子军，康凯，等.信息系统能力模型的信度与效度分析[J].情报杂志，2009,28(5):78-81.

[3] 张庆文，马苓.大学绩效评估指标系统的信度与效度分析[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,34(3):88-92.

[4] TABER K S.The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education[J].Research in science education,2018,48(6):1273-1296.

[5] 莫雷拉，卡瓦略，霍瓦斯.数据分析——统计、描述、预测与应用[M].吴常玉，译.北京：清华大学出版社，2021:56.

[6] 厄丹.白话统计学：第3版[M].彭志文，译.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2013:204.

[7] MACKENZIE S B,PODSAKOFF P M,JARVIS C B.The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions[J].Journal of applied psychology,2005,90(4):710.

[8] DIAMANTOPOULOS A,WINKLHOFER H M.Index construction with formative indicators:an alternative to scale development[J].Journal of marketing research,2001,38(2):269-277.

[9] BOLLEN K A.Multiple indicators:internal consistency or no necessary relationship?[J].Quality and quantity,1984,18(4):377-385.

[10] DIAMANTOPOULOS A,RIEFLER P,ROTH K P.Advancing formative measurement models[J].Journal of business research,2008,61(12):1203-1218.

[11] CENFETELLI R T,BASSELLIER G.Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research[J].MIS quarterly,2009,33(4):689-707.

[12] MAIMON O,ROKACH L.Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook[M].2nd ed.New York:Springer,2010:278-279.

炼化企业安全绿色高质量发展指标评价体系信度研究

Reliability study on the safe, eco-friendly and high-quality development evaluation indicator system of refinery enterprise

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陶丽楠 . 分布式光伏接入炼化企业对功率因数的影响及对策研究[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2024, 54(4): 49-53.
[2]	牟宗平, 朱婷婷, 刘畅 . 炼化企业汽油研究法辛烷值非线性调合模型应用总结[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2024, 54(2): 37-39.
[3]	梁峰 . 炼化企业管道供氢加氢站加注流程优化[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2024, 54(1): 1-4.
[4]	王鹏 . 炼化企业生产计划优化模型测算应用研究[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2023, 53(7): 44-48.
[5]	张伟. 构建大型炼化企业智能电网技术方案探讨 [J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2023, 53(3): 7-11.
[6]	涂连涛, 薛新超, 杨有文, 郭强, 妥小飞 . 某炼化企业炼油石脑油高效利用总结[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2023, 53(12): 10-13.
[7]	李英伟 . 炼化企业660V配电系统若干问题分析[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2022, 52(6): 47-50.
[8]	洪波. 某大型炼化企业降低柴汽比措施探索与实践[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2022, 52(6): 1-4.
[9]	戴先进. 炼化企业检修高浓度污水处理方案比较与实践[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2021, 51(5): 68-72.
[10]	何连之. 炼化企业配电设备状态检修决策系统研究[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2021, 51(10): 35-39.