炼油技术与工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 12-15.

• 加工工艺 • 上一篇    下一篇

连续重整装置与抽提负荷不匹配问题分析及改造

陈文涛   

  1. 中石化湖南石油化工有限公司
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-15 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-05-21
  • 作者简介:陈文涛,工程师,1995年毕业于湖南石油化工技术学院炼油专业,从事炼油、化工管理工作。联系电话:0730-8452062,E-mail:2zybcwt.clsh@sinopec.com。;

Analysis and renovation of load mismatch between continuous reforming unit and extraction unit

Chen Wentao   

  1. SINOPEC Hunan Petrochemical Co.Ltd.
  • Received:2023-12-15 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-05-21

摘要:

某公司扩能升级改造后,为确保以最大能力为1.8MPa氢气系统供氢,要求重整联合装置须满负荷运行,凸显出现有工艺重整装置与芳烃抽提装置负荷不匹配问题。为彻底解决该负荷不匹配的难题,经分析提出在脱重组分塔之后增产二甲苯装置前新增一座脱庚烷塔的方案。使用Aspen HYSYS模拟软件模拟得到脱庚烷塔投用后热载体系统负荷、原料性质、物料参数及产品情况,并与无脱庚烷塔时重整装置满负荷运行方案效益进行对比,得出增设脱庚烷塔后,总效益增加3 414元/h,全年产生效益2 800万元。并以此为理论依据对增设脱庚烷塔前后的实际情况进行对比,得出优化后装置虽未能达到理论最优工况,但经济效益、操作灵活度得到了提升。该方法对新建装置效益评估具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 连续重整, 芳烃抽提, 脱庚烷塔, Aspen HYSYS, 热载体炉, 操作条件, 物料平衡效益核算

Abstract:

After the expansion, upgrading and renovation of a certain company, in order to ensure the hydrogen supply of a hydrogen system with a maximum capacity of 1.8 MPa, it is required that the reforming unit must operate at full load, highlighting the load mismatch problem between the existing process reforming unit and the aromatics extraction unit. To completely solve the mismatch problem between extraction and reforming units, a plan is proposed after analysis to add a new deheptane tower before increasing xylene unit after the de-heavy oil tower. Using Aspen HYSYS simulation software, the load, feedstock properties, material parameters, and product situation of the heat carrier system after the operation of the deheptane tower are simulated. The benefits are compared with the full load operation plan of the reforming unit without a deheptane tower. It is found that the addition of a deheptane tower resulted in better benefits, with a total benefit increase of 3 414 yuan per hour and an annual benefit of 28 million yuan. Based on this as a theoretical basis, a comparison is made between the actual situation before and after adding the deheptane tower, and it is found that although the optimized unit does not achieve the theoretical optimal operating conditions, the economic benefits and operational flexibility are improved. This method has certain guiding significance for the evaluation of the benefits of new units.

Key words: continuous reforming, aromatic extraction, deheptane tower, Aspen HYSYS, heat carrier furnace, operation condition, material balance, benefit accounting