Petroleum Refinery Engineering ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 19-23.
• PROCESSING • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Peng
Received:
Online:
Published:
王鹏
作者简介:
Abstract: Through the comparative analysis of two domestic continuous reforming units using CYCLEMAX Ⅲ technology, the application of CYCLEMAX Ⅲ technology in the two units is studied. Starting from the general situation and process flow of the two sets of units, the advantages of technical improvements such as operation optimization in reduction area, temperature rise mode optimization in preheating area, improvement of lock hopper form and upgrading of internal components of regenerator are analyzed in detail. It is found that the reforming regeneration unit upgraded with CYCLEMAX Ⅲ technology not only has lower frame height and lower investment, but also its control mode and operation stability are more advanced and reasonable, and the subsequent overhaul and maintenance are more convenient. At the same time, benefiting from the upgrading and improvement of the electric heating mode and the internals of the regenerator, the converted energy consumption of per ton reforming feedstock decreases from 2.03 kgEo/t of the old refinery to 1.10 kgEo/t, a decrease of 45.8%. In addition, this paper introduces and analyzes the upgrading and improvement of CYCLEMAX Ⅲ technology embodied in the two sets of units.
Key words: CYCLEMAX, continuous reforming, regeneration unit, reduction area, preheating area, lock hopper, scallop cylinder, energy consumption
摘要: 通过对国内两套采用第三代连续重整再生技术(CYCLEMAX Ⅲ)的连续重整装置进行对比分析,研究了CYCLEMAX Ⅲ在两套装置上的应用情况。从两套装置的概况与工艺流程入手,分析了还原区操作优化、预热区升温模式优化、闭锁料斗形式改进及再生器内构件升级等技术改进的优势。研究发现,采用CYCLEMAX Ⅲ升级后的重整再生装置具有更低的框架高度和更低的投资,其控制方式更加先进合理,操作的稳定性更好,后续检修与维护更方便。同时受益于电加热模式与再生器内构件的升级改进,新建再生装置生产每吨重整进料的折算能耗由 2.03 kg标油/t 降至1.10 kg标油/t,下降幅度为45.8%。最后介绍和分析了两套装置上所体现出的CYCLEMAXⅢ的升级改进情况。
关键词: CYCLEMAX, 连续重整, 再生装置, 还原区, 预热区, 闭锁料斗, 扇形筒, 能耗
Wang Peng. Comparative analysis of two sets of CYCLEMAX Ⅲ continuous reforming regeneration units[J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2022, 52(5): 19-23.
王鹏. 两套CYCLEMAXⅢ连续重整再生装置对比分析[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2022, 52(5): 19-23.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal01.magtechjournal.com/lyjsygc/EN/
https://journal01.magtechjournal.com/lyjsygc/EN/Y2022/V52/I5/19
[1] 徐承恩.催化重整工艺与工程[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2006:705-707.
[2] 孙宝灿.重整催化剂连续再生装置氧氯化操作优化探讨[J].化学工程师,2021,35(8):70-72.
[3] 陈宝兵.两种连续重整催化剂再生技术对比[J].炼油技术与工程,2019,49(7):39-43.
[4] 张方方.连续重整装置的能耗浅析[J].石油炼制与化工,2008,39(5):67-70.
[5]刘宏杰,喻波.连续重整装置低负荷运行问题分析与对策[J].炼油技术与工程,2021,51(7):22-24.
[6] 蔡明件,王丁.UOP重整再生工艺CycleMax Ⅲ催化剂提升控制方案分析[J].石油化工自动化,2019,55(6):38-41.