Research progresses on control technology of condensable particulate matter from coal-fired boiler flue gas

Petroleum Refinery Engineering ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (11): 50-53.

• ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION • Previous Articles Next Articles

Research progresses on control technology of condensable particulate matter from coal-fired boiler flue gas

Wu Wei, Shan Guangbo, Liu Ling, Liu Yu, Li Baozhong

The General Station of Environmental Monitoring of Sinopec, Sinopec (Dalian) Research Institute of Petroleum and Petrochemicals Co., Ltd., Dalian, Liaoning 116045

Received:2024-07-24 Online:2024-11-17 Published:2024-11-28

燃煤锅炉烟气可凝结颗粒物控制技术进展

吴巍，单广波，刘玲，刘宇，李宝忠

中石化（大连）石油化工研究院有限公司中国石油化工集团公司环境监测总站，辽宁省大连市116045

作者简介:吴巍，副研究员，硕士研究生，2010年毕业于辽宁石油化工大学环境工程专业，研究方向为环境监测检测及环境污染治理技术研发。联系电话：0411-3969915，E-mail: wuwei.fshy@sinopec.com。
基金资助:
中国石化科技部项目（724024）

Abstract

Abstract:

The emission of filterable particulate matter (FPM) from the flue gas of coal-fired boilers has been effectively controlled since the full implementation of ultra-low emission standards in China, but the removal effect of condensable particulate matter (CPM) varies, and the smog and plume phenomena caused by CPM are still of great concern. At present, China has not released the monitoring and emission standards for CPM, and the emission characteristics of CPM in the flue gas of coal-fired boilers are unclear, with uneven CPM control effects. This paper summarizes the concept of CPM, CPM emission characteristics, hazards, composition, and control technologies of coal-fired boilers, and analyzes the influence of existing ultra-low emission flue gas treatment technologies and CPM control technologies on CPM removal. To effectively control CPM emissions, suggestions are made to: strengthen the control of coal sulfur content, optimize the combustion process; improve the fixed pollution source emission inventory, establish CPM and SO3 monitoring methods and emission standard systems; evaluate the impact of adding or modifying equipment or adjusting operating modes on the generation and removal of SO3 and CPM.

Key words:

color:#060607, font-family:-apple-system, blinkmacsystemfont, ", background-color:#FFFFFF, "> coal-fired boiler, flue gas, condensable particulate, smog, SO3, whitening technology, adsorption technology, cloud removal technology

摘要：

我国自全面实施超低排放标准以来，燃煤锅炉烟气中可过滤颗粒物（FPM）排放得到有效控制，但可凝结颗粒物（CPM）的脱除效果存在差异，由CPM引发的雾霾及烟羽现象仍备受关注。目前我国尚未发布CPM的监测及排放标准，燃煤锅炉烟气中CPM排放特性不清晰，CPM控制效果参差不齐。综述了CPM的概念、危害、组成及控制技术，分析了现有超低排放烟气治理技术及CPM控制技术对CPM脱除的影响。为有效控制CPM的排放，提出建议：加强煤质硫分管控，优化燃烧过程；完善固定污染源排放清单，健全CPM和SO3监测方法和排放标准体系；评估增改设备或调整运行方式对SO3和CPM生成和脱除的影响。

关键词:

color:#060607, font-family:-apple-system, blinkmacsystemfont, ", background-color:#FFFFFF, "> 燃煤锅炉, 烟气, 可凝结颗粒物, 雾霾, 三氧化硫, 脱白技术, 吸附技术, 云除技术

Wu Wei, Shan Guangbo, Liu Ling, Liu Yu, Li Baozhong. Research progresses on control technology of condensable particulate matter from coal-fired boiler flue gas[J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(11): 50-53.

吴巍, 单广波, 刘玲, 刘宇, 李宝忠. 燃煤锅炉烟气可凝结颗粒物控制技术进展[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2024, 54(11): 50-53.

References

[1] FENG Y, LI YCUIL. Critical review of condensable particulate matter [J]. Fuel, 2018, 224: 801-813.

[2] 王鹏程，袁畅，粱胜文，等. 超低排放燃煤电厂中湿式电除尘器对可凝结颗粒物排放特性的影响[J]. 环境科学，2022, 43(4): 1808-1813.

[3] 高峰，莹莹，王海波，等. 催化裂化再生烟气三氧化硫脱除技术对比分析[J]. 炼油技术与工程，2022, 52(1): 27-32.

[4] 洪志刚，张杨，刘永生，等. 燃煤电厂烟气非常规污染物检测与协同控制技术研究综述[J]. 发电技术，2020, 41(5): 517-526.

[5] 邓建国，王东滨，刘通浩，等. 燃煤电厂和钢铁厂排放可凝结颗粒物中有机组分研究[J]. 环境工程，2022, 40(3): 13.

[6] 刘宇，单广波，闫松，等. 燃煤锅炉烟气中SO3的生成、危害及控制技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程，2016, 34(12): 93-97.

[7] LI J W, LI X D, ZHOU C Y, et al. Correlation between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentration and particulate matter during the removal processes of a low-low temperature electrostatic precipitator [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(7): 7256-7262.

[8] 柴小康，黄国和，解玉磊，等. 某燃煤超低排放机组非常规污染物脱除[J]. 环境工程学报，2020, 14(12): 3480-3494.

[9] 刘晓敏，王乐乐，黄见勋，等. 低低温除尘器和海水脱硫可凝结颗粒物有机组分排放特征研究[J]. 中国电力，2020, 53(12): 263-269.

[10] 莫华，朱杰. 燃煤电厂有色烟羽治理要点分析与环境管理[J]. 中国电力，2019, 52(3): 10.

[11] YANG Z D, ZHENG C H, ZHANG X F, et al. Challenge of SO3 removal by wet electrostatic precipitator under simulated flue gas with high SO3 concentration[J]. Fuel, 2018, 217: 597-604.

[12] 李欣，李磊，韩天竹，等. 催化裂化装置烟气消白及盐雨净化技术应用总结[J]. 炼油技术与工程，2024, 54(6): 1.

[13] 侯勇，赵孟亮，吕浩，等. 吸附剂喷射耦合除尘系统对燃煤烟气多污染物的协同脱除特性研究[J]. 应用化工，2022, 51(7): 2170-2176.

[14] 高智溥，胡冬，张志刚，等. 碱性吸附剂脱除SO3技术在大型燃煤机组中的应用[J]. 中国电力，2017, 50(7): 102-108.

[15] 高境，赵传峰，刘宇，等. 有色烟羽分析及可凝结颗粒物管控技术综述[J]. 环境影响评价，2019, 41(3): 6-10.

Research progresses on control technology of condensable particulate matter from coal-fired boiler flue gas

燃煤锅炉烟气可凝结颗粒物控制技术进展

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Cao Dongxue. Technology status and development trend of anode materials for lithium-ion batteries [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 1-7.
[2]	Qiu Yunxia. Design and operations summary of a small-scale high sulfur natural gas purification unit [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 8-12.
[3]	Yu Ji, Han Xinhong, Xu Wanyi, Liao Changjian. Progress in zeolite molecular sieve-based inorganic membrane pervaporation and gas separation technologies [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 13-16.
[4]	Yan Pingping, Jiang Lei. Application summary of oil vapor recovery and treatment technology in oil terminal ship loading operations [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 22-25.
[5]	Han Kunpeng, Liu Tiebin, Weng Yanbo, Yuan Shenghu, Geng Xinguo. Study on hydrotreating reaction conditions for processing low sulfur residue marine fuel oil [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 26-29.
[6]	Zong Tao, Li Yonghao, Li Ze, Meng Jianxun, Wang Yu, Zhao Lingyu, Yao Lison. Leakage analysis of the re-contact air cooler tube bundle in continuous reforming unit [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 30-33.
[7]	Wu Guoqing, Liang Hongyan, Ni Xiaojing. Separation of ethylene feedstock components and simulation optimization of cracking products [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 34-37.
[8]	Xiong Xiangjin. Prediction of solid-liquid phase equilibrium data for toluene and C8 aromatics and benzene multi-component systems [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 38-42.
[9]	Zhang Xuan, Li Wenxuan, Yang Tao, Zhao Lixin, Zhu Yonghong, Yang Tianhua. The influence of pH value on the revival effect of spent adsorbents from gasoline adsorption desulfurization unit [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 43-46.
[10]	Wang Huiqiang. Application of low temperature hydrogenation catalyst CT6-13 in sulfur tail gas treatment system [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 47-50.
[11]	Zheng Xiangwen. Application of new safety and environmental protection technologies in large-scale liquid sulfur storage units [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 56-59.
[12]	Liu Zhiyu, Liao Changjian, Meng Fanfei, Wang Kun. Low temperature phase change adsorption technology for tank top gases in refining and chemical enterprises [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(9): 60-64.
[13]	Li Xiang. Operation and optimization of fluidized bed residue hydrogenation unit [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(8): 18-23.
[14]	Cheng Ming, Sun Xuedong, Wang Chao, Ji Chuanjia, Yang Ji. Optimization of catalyst circulation amount control after catalyst replacement in continuous reforming unit [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(8): 15-17.
[15]	Pan Qingpeng, Wang Weiwen. Research of bubble distribution in a staged multistage internal airlift loop reactor [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(8): 11-14.